Gene Expression Patterns Following Aphid-Mediated Polerovirus Transmission Highlight Differences Between Vector–Host and Host–Virus Interactions

View at publisher
Authors: Sudeep Pandey, Michael A. Catto, Phillip M. Roberts, Sudeep Bag, Alana L. Jacobson, Rajagopalbabu Srinivasan
Cited by: 0
References: 131

Abstract

Infection by aphid-transmitted poleroviruses modulates gene expression associated with plant development and defense. This study assessed the gene expression patterns following cotton leafroll dwarf virus (CLRDV) infection in primary and alternate hosts. Two comparisons (CLRDV-infected versus noninfested and mock-inoculated versus noninfested) were evaluated to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and to tease out differences in gene expression profiles between aphid feeding and aphid-mediated CLRDV infection in each host. CLRDV infection was characterized by 2,079, 1,238, 1,484, and 1,773 DEGs in the primary host cotton and in alternate hosts hibiscus, okra, and prickly sida, respectively. The number of DEGs upon aphid feeding was lower than in CLRDV infection in all hosts except okra. Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes terms identified DEGs associated with development, defense, and vector fitness influencing compounds in CLRDV-infected plants. Genes associated with phytohormones, photosynthesis, salicylic acid, jasmonic acid, pathogenesis-related proteins, heat shock proteins, transcription factors, membrane transporters, terpenoids, carbohydrates, and amino acids were differentially expressed in CLRDV-infected plants and varied between hosts. Few overlapping and numerous unique genes in the above-stated categories were differentially expressed upon aphid feeding and varied between hosts. DEGs associated with signaling pathways, transcription factors, systemic resistance, pathogenesis-related proteins, and carbohydrate and amino acid biosynthesis were common between aphid-mediated CLRDV infection and aphid feeding alone. The observed gene expression patterns reiterate that differences in host susceptibility to the virus and/or the vector could differentially influence host defense and development, as well as vector fitness.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Plant Virus Research Studies Insect-Plant Interactions and Control Invertebrate Immune Response Mechanisms

Publication details

Journal / source
Phytopathology
Volume
116
Issue
5
Pages
825–841
Publication date
8 January 2026
Language
EN