Feasibility of a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Propofol and Sevoflurane General Anesthesia in Endovascular Thrombectomy for Stroke: A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND: Although general anesthesia is commonly utilized for endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke, whether anesthetic agents affect clinical outcome is unknown. Retrospective studies comparing propofol and volatile agents have shown mixed results. A randomized controlled trial is needed to determine whether anesthetic agent affects clinical outcomes. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of conducting a definitive randomized controlled trial comparing propofol and sevoflurane-based anesthesia in patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy. METHODS: Patients booked to undergo endovascular thrombectomy were randomized to receive either propofol or sevoflurane-based general anesthesia. Feasibility outcomes assessed were recruitment rate, protocol adherence, and data completeness. Secondary outcomes included functional recovery (90-d modified Rankin Scale 0 to 2), mortality, early neurological improvement, blood pressure control intraoperatively and postoperatively, and adverse events. We also assessed for independent risk factors for functional recovery and death. RESULTS: Of 201 eligible patients, 93 (46.3%) were enrolled and 73 (36.3%) included in the final analysis. The consent and randomization model was challenging. Adherence to drug protocols was 94.5%. Data completion rate was 99%. There were no differences in secondary outcomes between groups. Mortality was associated with higher admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. Higher 90-day modified Rankin scores were associated with higher systolic blood pressures pre-reperfusion ( r =0.32, P