Automated Detection of Cervical Spinal Cord Compression on MRI Using YOLO11 Deep Learning Architecture

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective two-center external validation study was conducted at two medical centers, collecting cervical spine MRI data from patients suspected of degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) between March 2022 and August 2024, forming a consecutive series with external validation. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a deep learning model utilizing YOLO11 architecture for automated detection of cervical spinal cord compression on MRI and evaluate its performance against expert annotations. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: DCM represents the leading cause of nontraumatic spinal cord injury in adults. While MRI facilitates early detection and provides the foundation for timely intervention, image interpretation remains subjective and dependent on physician experience, resulting in diagnostic variability and challenges in clinical consistency. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A YOLO11-based deep learning model was implemented with a binary classification scheme (Normal vs . Compression). Five physicians annotated 1431 sagittal T2-weighted cervical MRI images from 735 patients using standardized protocols, achieving excellent interobserver agreement. The data set comprised training/validation sets (577 patients, 1141 images), an internal test set (64 patients, 115 images), and an external test set (94 patients, 175 images). Five-fold cross-validation assessed model robustness. Standardized preprocessing incorporating contrast enhancement, noise reduction, and normalization was applied. Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping enhanced model interpretability. RESULTS: Five-fold cross-validation yielded consistent performance with mAP50 ranging from 0.917 to 0.970, precision from 0.897 to 0.923, and recall from 0.922 to 0.946. External testing demonstrated statistically superior agreement with expert annotations (mAP50=0.944, 95% CI: 0.934-0.953) compared with mid-level physician annotations (mAP50=0.912, 95% CI: 0.908-0.919), with the difference being statistically significant (95% CI of difference: 0.015-0.043, P