Comparison of CTA and MRI for C1 Instrumentation Presurgical Planning

View at publisher
Authors: Artine Arzani, Ichiro Okano, Julia Wimmer, Maximilian Muellner, Henryk Paul Hans Haffer, Yusuke Dodo, Erika A. Chiapparelli, Thomas Caffard, Lukas Schönnagel, Jennifer Shue, Andrew A. Sama, Federico Pablo Girardi
+2 more Frank P. Cammisa, Alexander P. Hughes
Cited by: 0

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Retrospective study at a single academic tertiary care center. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate osseous and vascular structures at C1 on preoperative MRIs and CTAs. BACKGROUND DATA: No prior studies have compared the diagnostic accuracy between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography angiography (CTA) to assess C1 and internal carotid artery (ICA) anatomy prior to surgical instrumentation. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed adult patients who underwent both cervical spine CTA and MRI between 2007 and 2018. Patients with prior cervical surgery or MRIs not extending to the atlas were excluded. Ten standardized osseous and vascular measurements were performed on both modalities using anatomical landmarks at C1. Paired t-tests and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) assessed differences and agreement. A sub-analysis normalized measurements to anterior-posterior C1 length to account for potential modality-based scaling differences. RESULTS: Of 209 patients reviewed, 119 met inclusion criteria (mean age 65.1 years; 56% female). The agreement between CTA and MRI across 10 anatomical measurements was low, with ICCs ranging from 0.006 to 0.427. All measurements except the distance from the end of the ideal screw trajectory to the anterior plane of C1 demonstrated statistically significant differences between CTA and MRI (P

Fields of Study & Subjects

Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases

Publication details

Journal / source
Spine
Publication date
9 February 2026
Language
EN