Clinical Criteria for the Definition of Refractory Septic Shock: A Joint Delphi Consensus from the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM)

View at publisher
Authors: Marc Léone, Sheila Nainan Myatra, Siddharth Dugar, Patrick M. Wieruszewski, Lene Russell, Laura Evans, Louis Delamarre, Sameer Sharif, Michelle S. Chew, Michelle N. Gong, Glenn Hernández, Christa Schorr
+53 more Inès Lakbar, Susan Smith, Ignacio Martín‐Loeches, Djillali Annane, Martin Balík, Maurizio Cecconi, Daniel De Backer, Katia Donadello, Martin W. Dünser, Sharon Einav, Ricard Ferrer, Nicole P. Juffermans, Olfa Hamzaoui, Giovanni Landoni, Bruno Lévy, Cathrine McKenzie, Xavier Monnet, Marlies Ostermann, Claudia Spies, Mervyn Singer, Marieta Theodorakopoulou, Arzu Topeli̇, Erin F. Barreto, Seth R. Bauer, Laurence W. Busse, Craig M. Coopersmith, Clifford S. Deutschman, Andre L. Holder, Rishikesan Kamaleswaran, Matthieu Legrand, Greg S. Martin, Ryan C. Maves, Lama Nazer, Mark Nunnally, Hallie C. Prescott, Teresa Rincon, Gretchen L. Sacha, Christopher W. Seymour, Yaseen M. Arabi, Bruno Adler Maccagnan Pinheiro Besen, Alexandre Biasi Cavalcanti, Adam M. Deane, Simon Finfer, Naomi Hammond, Miguel Ibarra‐Estrada, Eduardo Kattan, Yuki Kotani, Flávia Ribeiro Machado, Gustavo A. Ospina‐Tascón, Mervyn Mer, Paul J. Young, Bram Rochwerg, Ashish Khanna
Cited by: 11
References: 77

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A definition of refractory septic shock is necessary to guide diagnosis, management, prognostication, research, and future guidelines for this most severe form of the disease. We sought to achieve consensus on clinical criteria that would be used to define refractory septic shock. DESIGN: Review of literature, expert panel position statements, and Delphi rounds with an international expert group. SETTING: Consensus was defined as having at least 75% of panellists in agreement or disagreement on the three highest or lowest levels of a 7-point Likert scale or based on responses to single- or multiple-choice questions, respectively. SUBJECTS: A panel of multinational, multiprofessional and multidisciplinary critical care experts assembled by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (57 invitations and 56 participants). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A five-round Delphi process was conducted for consensus and stability. The steering committee proposed 34 statements, and five of them were rejected by panel experts after round 2. Among 29 statements selected from eight domains, consensus was reached for 13. The panel agreed on the need for a comprehensive consensus set of clinical criteria for refractory septic shock. Markers of organ dysfunction (75%, 2 rounds), tissue perfusion (91.1%, 2 rounds) including lactate (94.6%, 2 rounds) and capillary refill time (76.8%, 2 rounds), assessment of fluid-responsiveness after initial resuscitation (92.9%, 5 rounds), and use of vasoactive drugs at norepinephrine equivalents greater than 0.5 µg/kg/min (75.0%, 3 rounds), were selected as clinical criteria of refractory septic shock. The use of critical care ultrasound (CCUS) (92.9%, 3 rounds) was the single diagnostic modality that reached a consensus-based agreement. CONCLUSIONS: A consensus for 13 criteria to frame the definition of refractory septic shock was reached. Refractory septic shock is characterised by persistently elevated lactate concentrations and or prolonged capillary refill time in patients with septic shock who are fluid unresponsive, require a norepinephrine base equivalent dose greater than 0.5 micrograms per kilogram per minute, and undergo CCUS assessment when mixed shock is suspected.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy Adrenal Hormones and Disorders

Publication details

Journal / source
Critical Care Medicine
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Volume
54
Issue
5
Pages
1073–1091
Publication date
24 March 2026
Language
EN