Sedation, Sleep, and Sudden Death: How ICU Sedation Alters Cardiac Rhythmicity and Autonomic Tone

View at publisher
Authors: Hadrian sHoang-Vu Tran, Audrey Thu, Anu Radha Twayana, Axel Fuertes, Marco Gonzalez, Marina Basta, Maggie James, Krutagni Adwait Mehta, Ghulam Rabbani Anwar, Jevon Lamar Harrison, Jaber Hebeeb Musalli, Daniel Eliáš
+10 more Camille Angela Mariano, Michelle Capahi Varona, Yghor Myrtho Figaro, Rachelle El-Houayek, Amir Behzad Heidari, Damien Islek, Basel Hajal, Abraham Lo, William H. Frishman, Wilbert S. Aronow
Cited by: 0
References: 51

Abstract

Sedation is essential for modern intensive care management, yet its effects on autonomic regulation, circadian biology, and cardiac electrophysiology remain incompletely understood. This review synthesizes current evidence on how commonly used sedative agents influence autonomic tone, sleep architecture, and electrophysiologic stability in critically ill patients. Mechanistic data indicate that propofol, dexmedetomidine, benzodiazepines, and ketamine exert distinct autonomic signatures that alter heart rate variability, baroreflex sensitivity, and ventricular repolarization. Clinical studies show that deeper or prolonged sedation is associated with increased incidences of atrial fibrillation, bradyarrhythmias, ventricular ectopy, and QT interval abnormalities, particularly in the context of sepsis, hypoxia, or metabolic derangements. Sleep disruption and circadian misalignment further diminish nocturnal vagal dominance, heighten sympathetic activation, and contribute to arrhythmogenic vulnerability. Advances in physiologic monitoring, including heart rate variability metrics, QT variability, T-wave alternans, and electroencephalogram-electrocardiogram coupling, offer emerging tools to detect early neuro-cardiac instability and guide individualized sedation strategies. Collectively, current evidence supports viewing sedation as a modifiable determinant of neuro-cardiac homeostasis. Optimizing sedation depth, preserving circadian cues, and integrating multimodal physiologic monitoring may reduce arrhythmia risk and improve outcomes in the intensive care unit, although further research is required to address substantial gaps in physiologic characterization and high-risk populations.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Anesthesia and Sedative Agents Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Publication details

Journal / source
Cardiology in Review
Publication date
6 January 2026
Language
EN