Reducing Waste in Dermatologic Surgery: An Evidence-Based Review of Sustainability Strategies

View at publisher
Authors: Vixey Silva, Tory Starzyk, Mohammad Fardos, Gili Amid-Toby, Stanislav N. Tolkachjov
Cited by: 3
References: 30

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dermatologic surgery generates considerable medical waste due to its high procedural volume, yet specialty-specific guidance on sustainable practices remains limited. OBJECTIVE: To present an evidence-based framework for reducing waste in dermatologic surgery while maintaining safety and efficacy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive search of PubMed was conducted for articles published from 2000 onward using key terms combining predefined waste reducing interventions (e.g. multipack nonsterile gloves, reusable drapes and instruments, longer-acting anesthetics, continuous suturing, simplified dressings) with ("waste reduction" OR "sustainability"). Evidence was graded by Oxford CEBM (1a-5) and GRADE (A-D). RESULTS: Twenty-eight sustainability strategies were identified across the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases of dermatologic surgery, 15 of which were supported by level 1 to 2 evidence. High-level interventions included the use of nonsterile gloves, longer-acting anesthetics, reusable drapes and instruments, absorbable and continuous suturing techniques, and occlusive dressings. CONCLUSION: This review summarizes evidence-based sustainability strategies shown to reduce environmental impact and provides a practical framework for potential implementation in dermatologic surgery.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Climate Change and Health Impacts Healthcare cost quality practices Body Contouring and Surgery

Publication details

Journal / source
Dermatologic Surgery
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Volume
52
Issue
7
Pages
648–652
Publication date
2 January 2026
Language
EN