Comparison of postocclusion surge between venturi and peristaltic phacoemulsification pump type

View at publisher
Authors: Coby Soule, Tyler Whitaker, Nathan Sherbotie, Jessie Montgomery, Kolja Klug, Lincoln Wagner, Jeff H. Pettey
Cited by: 1
References: 20

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the postocclusion surge characteristics of venturi and peristaltic-generated vacuum levels. SETTING: University setting, Salt Lake City, Utah. DESIGN: Experimental study. METHODS: The Johnson & Johnson Veritas machine and Ellips FX handpiece with standard pack tips, with variable peristaltic and venturi settings, were used. A standard quadrant removal preset had the settings: vacuum 450 mm Hg, aspiration 60 mm Hg, and bottle heights 41 cm and 81 cm. To monitor pressure changes, a rubber disk was fixed within a sealed chamber fitted with an electric sensor. The phacoemulsification tip was inserted through a small opening; the foot pedal was set to position 3. The tip was in contact with the disk to replicate tip occlusion and then pulled from the disk to simulate occlusion break. 10 trials were performed for each intraocular pressure and vacuum type. RESULTS: A significant difference ( P < .01) was observed in postocclusion surge magnitude between venturi and peristaltic pumps at 41 cm and 81 cm bottle heights. No significant difference was observed in surge duration at either bottle height. Average duration of surge for venturi and peristaltic at 41 cm was 1.56 ± 0.75 seconds and 2.25 ± 0.40 seconds, respectively; at 81 cm 2.27 ± 1.41 seconds and 2.90 ± 1.10 seconds, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Data suggest that at bottle heights of 41 cm and 81 cm, with indicated settings, venturi settings on the Veritas platform have a lower postocclusion surge magnitude compared with peristaltic settings. This indicates that there may be a platform-specific lower risk for posterior capsular tear when using venturi settings in the Veritas system during cataract surgery.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Intraocular Surgery and Lenses Ocular Disorders and Treatments Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques

Publication details

Journal / source
Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Volume
52
Issue
5
Pages
498–502
Publication date
10 February 2026
Language
EN