Predictors and impact of multiple listing for liver transplantation in the United States across the acuity circles eras

View at publisher
Authors: Claire Cywes, Audrey C Bankes, Ali M. Hamandi, Robert J Daniels, David C. Fipps, Frank G Lee, Marka F Ellertson, Benjamin D. Limburg, Lindsay R. Beaman, Tayyab S Diwan
Cited by: 1
References: 14

Abstract

Multi-listing (ML) increases the odds of transplantation compared with single-center listing. However, not all patients have equivalent access to ML. The recent allocation policy change prioritized distance from the donor hospital in an attempt to decrease geographic disparities. This study assessed access to liver transplant (LT) given ML practices before and after the acuity circles policy change. United Network for Organ Sharing data were queried for LTs between January 1, 2016, and November 1, 2024. Patients were grouped by listing at one versus multiple centers and by acuity circle era (ACE). Cohort characteristics and comparisons were described using chi-square and Wilcoxon rank tests. Multivariable logistic regressions and propensity score match (PSM) were performed to assess associations between ML and LT. The final cohort consisted of 105,030 patients; 4084 (3.9%) were multi-listed. Racial/ethnic minority groups, less educated, and publicly insured candidates were less often multi-listed. ML was positively associated with LT in all analyses (overall: OR=1.180, p

Fields of Study & Subjects

Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes Organ Donation and Transplantation Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments

Publication details

Journal / source
Liver Transplantation
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Volume
32
Issue
11
Pages
1596-1603
Publication date
28 April 2026
Language
EN