Efficacy and safety of denosumab compared with conventional medications in the treatment of osteoporosis: A meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis

Read full text
Authors: L. Li, Jiahao Xu, Hongjian Ji, Shuang Xia, Fengchao Shi
Cited by: 1
References: 41

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This meta-analysis aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of denosumab versus conventional medications in treating osteoporosis. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials from PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang Data, and VIP were searched via the web from the onset to April 2025. RevMan 5.4 software was used for performing a systematic review. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) of serious adverse events (SAEs) was performed using TSA 0.9.5.10 Beta. RESULTS: A total of 15 studies with 16,437 patients were included. Compared to the control group (conventional medications), the experimental group with denosumab showed no significant difference in increasing total hip bone mineral density (BMD) (mean difference [MD] = 0.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [0.00-0.06], P = .06) and femoral neck BMD (MD = 0.02, 95% CI = [-0.04 to 0.08], P = .43), but it significantly improved lumbar spine BMD (MD = 0.07, 95% CI = [0.03-0.11], P = .003). In addition, there were no differences between the 2 groups in terms of reducing osteonecrosis of the jaw (odds ratio [OR] = 1.49, 95% CI = [0.65-3.46], P = .35), atypical fractures (OR = 1.77, 95% CI = [0.38-8.31], P = .47), AEs (OR = 0.98, 95% CI = [0.91-1.07], P = .71), and SAEs (OR = 0.94, 95% CI = [0.53-1.69], P = .85), and TSA showed an insufficient information size with SAEs of denosumab compared with conventional medications in the treatment of osteoporosis. CONCLUSION: It can be concluded that denosumab can improve lumbar spine BMD compared with conventional medications for osteoporosis; furthermore, no evidence was found that the denosumab had a significantly higher incidence of SAEs than the control group and it is safe to apply. However, given the potential bias of the included studies, more high-quality, large-sample randomized controlled trials are needed to validate this conclusion further and to provide a more reliable basis for the use of medication in the clinical treatment of osteoporosis. The registration number in PROSPERO is CRD420251051061 (http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/).

Fields of Study & Subjects

Bone health and osteoporosis research Bone Metabolism and Diseases Bone health and treatments

Publication details

Journal / source
Medicine
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Volume
105
Issue
2
Pages
e47150–e47150
Publication date
9 January 2026
Language
EN