Predicting high health care use in patients with spinal disorder in secondary care: model development and validation

Read full text
Authors: Lise Grethe Kjønø, Karin Magnusson, Marianne Bakke Johnsen, Kjersti Storheim, Stine Haugaard Clausen, Maja Wilhelmsen, Søren O'Neill, Are Hugo Pripp, Bjørnar Berg, Christian Volmar Skovsgaard, Jan Hartvigsen, Margreth Grotle
+1 more Ørjan Nesse Vigdal
Cited by: 1
References: 63

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Spinal disorders are among the biggest contributors to health care utilization (HCU). Objective: To develop and externally validate a prediction model for high all-cause HCU (75th percentile during 1 year after the index date) among patients with spinal disorders visiting multidisciplinary secondary care clinics. Methods: We developed and internally validated the model using the Norwegian Neck and Back Registry, including patients registered between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2020, linked with national health registries (N = 9092). For external validation, we used data from the Danish SpineData Registry, linked with national registries, for the same period (N = 34,853). We assessed Nagelkerke R 2 , discrimination (area under receiver operating characteristics curve [AUC]), and calibration (calibration-in-the-large [CITL], slope, and calibration plot). Results: The final model included sex, nationality, education, physical activity, smoking, prior HCU, work status, disability, health-related quality of life, medicine use, diagnosis, kinesiophobia, and comorbidity. It demonstrated acceptable discrimination (AUC 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77–0.78), an R 2 of 0.26, and good calibration after internal validation. Upon external validation, the model demonstrated excellent discrimination (AUC 0.81, 95% CI 0.80–0.81) and an R 2 of 0.31. The calibration slope was 1.08 (95% CI 1.06–1.11) and CITL was 0.16 (95% CI 0.12–0.19). Predicted probabilities closely matched observed probabilities across all deciles in internal validation, with slight underestimation of high HCU in the top 3 deciles during external validation. Conclusion: Overall, the model shows promise in predicting high HCU in patients with spinal disorders referred to secondary care but requires further testing and validation in implementation settings before recommendation.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology Healthcare Policy and Management

Publication details

Journal / source
PAIN Reports
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
e1382–e1382
Publication date
16 January 2026
Language
EN