Secondary Burn Reconstruction

View at publisher
Authors: Ronald M. Cornely, Benjamin Savitz, Andrew J. James, Barite W Gutama, Erin N. Abbott, Ronnie N. Mubang, J Blair Summitt, Elizabeth Slater, William Lineaweaver
Cited by: 1
References: 19

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Burn reconstruction restores function and appearance after initial burn treatment, yet these interventions may remain underutilized due to fragmented care systems and inadequate follow-up. National datasets and procedural coding systems often fail to capture the scope of secondary reconstruction, limiting insights into long-term care needs. Therefore, this prospective analysis employs a prospective registry to track the volume, procedural patterns, and care settings of secondary burn reconstruction to create a basis of practice development of reconstructive burn surgery within a burn unit practice. METHODS: A prospective registry was implemented from January 2023 to December 2024 to track secondary burn reconstruction procedures. Data collected included procedural type, timing from initial injury, original total body surface area burned, and the types of healthcare systems in which the procedures were performed. Registry data were compared to institutional acute burn care data from 2023 and 2024 to contextualize reconstructive volume and demographics. RESULTS: From 2023 to 2024, 353 reconstructive cases were identified. Laser scar revision was the most common procedure (50.4% in 2023; 44.7% in 2024). Most patients had initially minor injuries (

Fields of Study & Subjects

Burn Injury Management and Outcomes Wound Healing and Treatments Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques

Publication details

Journal / source
Annals of Plastic Surgery
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Volume
96
Issue
2
Pages
144–147
Publication date
23 January 2026
Language
EN