Is Lower Pole Access Safer for Ultrasound-Guided Supine Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy?

View at publisher
Authors: Ziv Savin, Leila Rahmani, Eve Frangopoulos, Vinay S. Durbhakula, Asher L Mandel, Juan S. Serna, Aubrey Dibello, Esther Kim, Adam Daniel Geffner, Kavita Gupta, Blair E. Gallante, William M. Atallah
+1 more Mantu Gupta
Cited by: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Ultrasound (US)-guided supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is increasingly being adopted. The aim of this study was to assess the safety of lower vs non-lower pole access (non-LPa) in supine US-guided PCNL. METHODS: This study was a retrospective cohort analysis of 228 patients who underwent single-access US-guided supine PCNL between March 2023 and June 2024 and were categorized into lower (n = 162), interpolar (n = 42), and upper pole (n = 21) access categories. Baseline demographics, stone characteristics, and intraoperative details were analyzed and compared between the groups. Safety outcomes, including 30-day postoperative total and major complications (based on Clavien-Dindo classification), as well as pain scores, were compared between lower pole access (LPa) and non-LPa. RESULTS: = .05). There were 2 visceral injuries in the interpolar group. Visual analogue scale pain scores at the recovery room were not different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: When performing US-guided supine PCNL, LPa has a superior safety profile, resulting in fewer major and total complications compared with non-LPa.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments Ureteral procedures and complications Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders

Publication details

Journal / source
Urology Practice
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
285–293
Publication date
12 January 2026
Language
EN