A comparison of ancient DNA yields across ossicles and the petrous bone reveals the best preservation in the stapes and incus

Read full text
Authors: Ekin Sağlıcan, Arda Sevkar, Duygu Deniz Kazancı, Gonzalo Oteo‐García, Sevgi Yorulmaz, Kıvılcım Başak Vural, Gökhan Çakan, Gökçen Adiloğlu, Duru Buldak, Güneş Duru, Aliye Öztan, Brenna Ryan Hassett
+7 more Nurcan Kayacan, Aslı Erim Özdoğan, Anders Götherström, Füsun Özer, Ömür Dilek Erdal, Yılmaz Selim Erdal, Mehmet Somel
Cited by: 2
References: 53

Abstract

The petrous bone is considered the most efficient source of endogenous DNA across skeletal tissues in ancient DNA (aDNA) research as well as in forensic work. Recently, aDNA in auditory ossicle bones was shown to be comparably well preserved as in the petrous, although no attempt was made to distinguish among the three ossicle bones. In this study, we compare aDNA profiles across matched ossicle- and petrous-derived sequencing libraries prepared from 29 human skeletons from Neolithic Anatolia and Medieval Iberia. We find that the stapes and incus provide higher human endogenous aDNA than the petrous bone, with >2× higher median rates of endogenous aDNA recovery, whereas the malleus performs similarly to the petrous. Human aDNA fragments retrieved from the stapes were 8% longer than those from the petrous, whereas postmortem damage, clonality, and contamination rates were comparable among the studied bone types. These observations are corroborated by data from nonmatched ossicle or petrous libraries from 81 individuals from the same contexts, with the highest endogenous aDNA content observed in the stapes. Despite being the smallest bone in the human skeleton, the stapes, along with the incus, may be among the most optimal aDNA sources yet identified.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Forensic and Genetic Research Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies

Publication details

Journal / source
Genome Research
Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Volume
36
Issue
8
Pages
1614–1623
Publication date
11 June 2026
Language
EN
Document type
Preprint