When artificial intelligence is perceived as a threat: unraveling its paradoxical impact on knowledge hiding in the workplace

View at publisher
Authors: Limin Lin, Kuoyi Lin, Qian Qian Chen, Meilian Liu
Cited by: 3
References: 66

Abstract

Purpose Drawing upon conservation of resources (COR) and affective events theories, this study aims to investigate the paradoxical impact of the threat of technological disruptions (TTD) on employee knowledge hiding behavior (KHB). It tests the mediating roles of workplace anxiety and work passion and the moderating role of organizational artificial intelligence (AI) readiness to uncover the paradoxical emotional mechanisms underlying this relationship. Design/methodology/approach Data were collected from 496 employees working in AI-vulnerable industries. The data were analyzed using Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS) 23.0 for reliability and descriptive statistics and Mplus 8.3 for confirmatory factor analysis and hypothesis testing. Bootstrapping was used for mediation and moderation analyses. Findings Perceived technological threat is positively associated with KHB. Workplace anxiety and work passion mediate this relationship. Workplace anxiety and obsessive passion increase knowledge hiding, whereas harmonious passion reduces it. Moreover, organizational AI readiness positively moderates the relationship between TTD and workplace anxiety. Practical implications The findings provide practical insights for managers to design interventions that reduce employees’ technological anxiety and foster work passion, thereby mitigating KHBs amid digital transformation. Originality/value Despite increasing interest in AI’s organizational implications, limited empirical research has investigated how perceived technological threats shape employees’ knowledge behaviors. This study develops a framework based on COR and affective events theories that reveals the dual emotional mechanisms and boundary conditions underlying knowledge hiding in AI-driven workplaces, advancing theoretical understanding of knowledge management behaviors under technological change.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Cyberloafing and Workplace Behavior Technostress in Professional Settings Knowledge Management and Sharing

Publication details

Journal / source
Journal of Knowledge Management
Publisher
Emerald
Pages
1–18
Publication date
10 February 2026
Language
EN