Comparative Analysis of LLMs Against Jailbreak Prompts

View at publisher Summarise with VIRAT
Authors: Rwittik Sarker, Anika Tabassum Omi, Nabil Walid Rafat, Zabid Rahman, Ferdous Ahmed Auvi, Amitabha Chakrabarty, Md. Fahim-Ul-Islam, Md Tanzim Reza
Cited by: 0
References: 12

Summary

No summary yet. VIRAT can read this paper and write a plain-language summary of its aim, methods, key findings and limitations.

Summarise with VIRAT Free to try with your Science Catalogs account.

Abstract

The rise of open-source Large Language Models (LLMs) has made it more important than ever to protect them from jailbreak attacks. These attacks trick models into giving harmful or unsafe responses. In this paper, we test how well three popular models, Mistral-7B-Instruct-v2, Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, and Qwen-2.5-7B-Instruct can handle such attacks (PAIR, DAN, DSN, GPTFuzzer) using prompts from JailbreakBench and other datasets. At First, the models were easily jailbroken, with success rates of up to 67.24%. We then applied two defenses: SmoothLLM (an ensemble-based perturbation method) and PerplexityFilter (a statistical anomaly detection method). These defenses worked well for some models, for example, Llama dropped to 27.42% ASR but didn’t always help, especially with Mistral-7B-Instruct-v2 and the GPTFuzzer. This shows that current defenses don’t work equally for all models.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning Security and Verification in Computing Topic Modeling

Publication details

Journal / source
International Conference on Electrical, Computer & Telecommunication Engineering (ICECTE)
Pages
1–6
Publication date
29 January 2026
Language
EN