Optimizing Control Definitions in Opioid Use Disorder Genetic Research Using Electronic Health Records

Read full text
Authors: Maria Niarchou, Ellen Tsai, Mariela V. Jennings, Annika Faucon, Hyunjoon Lee, Kritika Singh, Justin D. Tubbs, Panos Roussos, Tian Ge, Richard C. Crist, Rachel Vickers‐Smith, Howard Edenberg
+13 more Amy Moore, Bradley T. Webb, Eric Johnson, PsycheMERGE Substance Use Disorder Workgroup, Rachel L. Kember, Jordan W. Smoller, Lea K. Davis, BJ Coombes, Georgios Voloudakis, David Burstein, TT Mallard, Vanessa Troiani, Sandra Sanchez‐Roige
Cited by: 1
References: 43

Abstract

ABSTRACT Amidst the opioid crisis, understanding the genetic basis of opioid use disorder (OUD) is crucial for identifying biological mechanisms and intervention points. However, genome‐wide association studies (GWASs) have been hampered by inadequate sample sizes and often the use of control populations not assessed for prior opioid exposure. Because opioid exposure is a prerequisite for the development of OUD, consideration of exposure history in controls is important. Electronic health record data (EHR) paired with genomic information allow a broader sampling of patients with OUD and exposed controls. We leveraged data across two healthcare systems to evaluate the impact of using controls not screened for opioid exposure (‘generic’) versus minimally opioid‐exposed control (‘exposed’). First, at the phenotypic level, we conducted phenome‐wide association studies (PheWAS) to compare the medical comorbidity profiles of OUD cases when using generic versus exposed controls. While PheWAS results for OUD‐related comorbidities were more pronounced when using the generic group, 83% of the disease associations were overlapping and of similar effect sizes. Second, at the genetic level, we conducted GWAS (cases vs. generic; cases vs. exposed) and assessed differences in genetic correlations and degrees of phenotypic misclassification. Genetic results were concordant across control groups based on heritability (generic: 0.16 ± 0.07 vs. 0.10 ± 0.07), associations with the coding OPRM1 variant rs1799971 ( p generic = 8.83E‐03 vs. p exposed = 1.83E‐02) and genetic correlations with prior OUD GWAS ( r g‐generic = 0.83 ± 0.26 vs. r g‐exposed = 0.78 ± 0.27). Although GWASs were limited by sample size ( N generic = 6269, N exposed = 6365), compared to an independent OUD GWAS ( N = 425 944), the dilution value for the two GWAS was not different from 1, suggesting no major impact of phenotypic misclassification. This study represents the first effort to enhance OUD genetic research through optimization of control definitions using EHR data. Generic controls ascertained within the US health systems, where exposure to prescription opioids is high, offer a practical alternative for genetic studies of OUD.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Genetic Associations and Epidemiology Opioid Use Disorder Treatment Pain Management and Opioid Use

Publication details

Journal / source
Addiction Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
e70094–e70094
Publication date
1 January 2026
Language
EN