Intracorporeal Versus Extracorporeal Anastomosis in Crohn’s Disease: Recurrence and Perioperative Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Ileocecectomy

BACKGROUND: Minimal-invasive surgery (MIS) was proven beneficial in Crohn's Disease (CD). Intracorporeal anastomosis (ICA) represents a further improvement as it is associated with decreased complications and shorter hospitalization. Extracorporeal anastomosis (ECA) is preferred to ICA as it allows haptic feedback of the bowel and mesentery, which is historically required for bowel resection in CD to minimize recurrences. We compared ICA and ECA in terms of recurrences and complications. METHODS: All patients between 2016 and 2022 with Crohn's disease who underwent a MIS ileocecectomy were identified and divided into ICA and ECA groups. Exclusion criteria were open surgery, end ileostomies, follow-up < 1 month, and ileocecectomy not due to CD. RESULTS: 107 patients were included in the ICA group (44.9% male, mean age of 40.2 [±16.6] years), while 270 patients were in the ECA group (46.7% male, mean age of 41.9 [±17.3] years). The rate of endoscopic recurrences with a Rutgeerts score > 2, clinical recurrence, and surgical recurrence were not statistically different between the two cohorts. On the multivariable analysis for endoscopic and clinical recurrences, the ICA/ECA approach was not significant. The ECA group revealed a higher overall complication rate (30.4% versus 15.9%, p = 0.004). The median length of stay was significantly reduced in the ICA group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: ICA seems to be safe in ileocecectomies for CD. The complication rate and length of stay were reduced while not affecting the endoscopic, clinical, and surgical recurrence rates. MIS technology provides enhanced visualization and haptic feedback, which could be used as surrogates for the tactile evaluation intra-operatively.