Current practice of colposuspension in the United Kingdom: Results of a national survey

Read full text
Authors: Kar Yee Lor, Annika Taithongchai, George Araklitis, Aysha Waheed, Rayan Mohamed‐Ahmed, Angie Rantell, Dudley Robinson
Cited by: 0
References: 16

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Colposuspension procedures have increased in the UK following the 2018 suspension of vaginal mesh for stress urinary incontinence. However, significant variation exists in preoperative assessment, patient selection, surgical approach, and postoperative care. This survey aims to explore current national practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A questionnaire was distributed to members of the British Society of Urogynaecology (BSUG) and the British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS). RESULTS: Fifty-three clinicians responded; most were gynecologists with a special interest in urogynecology (60%) or urogynecology subspecialists (34%). Response rates were 12% (51/442) among BSUG members and 20 for 2%. Most surgeons (85%) perform preoperative urodynamics in all patients, while 15% restrict testing to women with mixed symptoms. Almost all (98.1%) would treat detrusor overactivity or symptomatic overactive bladder prior to offering colposuspension. Forty-five percent will perform colposuspension at any functional or maximum cytometric capacity; others use cutoffs of >400 mL (19%), >300 mL (26%) or >200 mL (10%). Fifty-five percent reported a BMI limit of

Fields of Study & Subjects

Pelvic floor disorders treatments Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research Ureteral procedures and complications

Publication details

Journal / source
Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica
Volume
105
Issue
7
Pages
1398–1404
Publication date
11 March 2026
Language
EN