Consensus Report of Group 4 of the 1st Global Consensus for Clinical Guidelines for the Rehabilitation of the Edentulous Maxilla: Conventional Dentures, Implant Overdentures and Implant‐Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses

Read full text
Authors: Charlotte Stilwell, Ronald E. Jung, Florian Beuer, Giulia Brunello, Jae‐Kook Cha, Jeanette Chua Keng Ling, Donald A. Curtis, Karim El-Kholy, Brian J. Goodacre, Lisa Heitz-Mayfield, Mohit Kheur, Sunjai Kim
+12 more Hisatomo Kondo, Purnima Kumar, Alejandro Lanis, David Norré, B. Pjetursson, Srinivasa Rao Bhasmey, Irena Sailer, Misi Si, Amerian Sones, Franz J Strauss, Stefan Wolfart, Zitzmann Nu
Cited by: 2
References: 87

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The 1st Global Consensus for Clinical Guidelines (GCCG) in Implant Dentistry introduced an innovative, evidence-based, patient-centred approach to developing practical recommendations for the rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla. Within this framework, Group 4 focused on formulating clinical recommendations for the planning and delivery of conventional dentures (CD), implant overdentures (IOD) and implant-supported fixed complete dentures (IFCD) for patients with an edentulous maxilla. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Group 4 followed the S2k-level guideline framework of the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF), applying a structured nominal group technique. The evidence base included two systematic reviews synthesising patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and clinician-reported outcomes (ClinROs) and their respective measures in patients with an edentulous maxilla. In addition, single-round international surveys were conducted involving expert clinicians, patients and cross-disciplinary experts. Draft recommendations were developed during the in-person consensus meeting in Boston (June 16-18, 2025) and finalised through anonymous plenary voting. Consensus thresholds were predefined at ≥ 75% and ≤ 95% agreement for a consensus and > 95% agreement for a strong consensus. RESULTS: Group 4 participants formulated 14 clinical recommendations covering five stages of treatment: (i) patient selection, (ii) diagnostics, (iii) treatment planning, (iv) treatment procedures and (v) maintenance. During plenary voting, 6 recommendations reached consensus and eight achieved strong consensus. Voting participation per recommendation ranged from 60 to 84 participants (mean 75). CONCLUSIONS: Group 4 consensus statements provide structured guidance on the use of removable and fixed implant-supported dental prostheses for the rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla. The recommendations reflect current evidence, expert opinion on clinical practice across disciplines and patient perspectives. Key evidence gaps-especially regarding standardised PROMs, long-term outcomes and maintenance protocols-identify priorities for future clinical research.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes Dental materials and restorations Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments

Publication details

Journal / source
Clinical Oral Implants Research
Publisher
Wiley
Volume
37
Issue
S30
Pages
S81–S107
Publication date
1 February 2026
Language
EN