Cellularity of Routinely Prepared Cell Blocks: Insights From an International Study

Read full text
Authors: Irena Srebotnik Kirbiš, Ivana Kholova, Heini Huhtala, Margareta Strojan Fležar, Ruben Rodrigues Roque, Heli-Hakso Mäkinen, Miisa Litmanen, Danijela Vrdoljak-Mozetič, Suzana Harabajsa, Ekkehard Hewer, Enrica Bresaola, Lia Van Zuylen-Manders
+25 more Pawel Schubert, Maria Praça, Esther Diana Rossi, Peter Karl Bode, Laetitia Lacoste-Collin, Jessica Barizzi, Vincenzo Fiorentino, T. Hedegaard, Sietske van der Meulen, Ute Engel, Iris E. Timmer, Tugba Taskin Turkmenoglu, Jadranka Vidak, Elena Vigliar, Sonsoles Aso Manso, Jamal Musayev, Guliz Akdas Barkan, María D. Lozano, Ljube Ivkovski, Bettien van Hemel, Luca Carsana, Clementina Di Tonno, Birgit Weynand, Tania Labiano, B Cochand‐Priollet
Cited by: 1
References: 31

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) cell blocks (CBs) are widely used for processing cytology specimens, but preparation methods remain variable and non-standardised. Low cellularity is a common limitation that may compromise diagnostic utility. This study aimed to evaluate the cellularity of routinely prepared CBs across different preparation methods, laboratories and sample types. METHODS: Each laboratory in this multicentre observational study retrospectively assessed 50 consecutive CBs prepared using a single method. Cellularity of Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E)-stained sections was semi-quantitatively evaluated by two independent reviewers per laboratory in four categories: acellular, low (≤ 100 cells), medium (100-500 cells) and high cellular (> 500 cells). The proportion of poorly cellular CBs (acellular + low cellular) was compared across methods, laboratories and sample types using non-parametric tests. RESULTS: Cellularity was assessed for 1817 CBs prepared using Agar (22%), HistoGel (19%), Plasma-Thrombin (19%), Cellient (17%), In-house (15%) and Shandon/Epredia (8%) methods. The proportion of poorly cellular CBs ranged from 4% to 80% across laboratories (mean 27%, median 25%), with no consistent clustering by method. Median proportions by method ranged from 12% (Cellient) to 35% (Agar), but inter-method differences were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Substantial variability was observed both across and within sample types and preparation methods. CONCLUSIONS: The study revealed marked variability in the proportion of poorly cellular CBs among preparation methods and laboratories, highlighting the need for improved processing and monitoring of CB adequacy.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Animal testing and alternatives Protein purification and stability Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects

Publication details

Journal / source
Cytopathology
Publisher
Wiley
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
214–221
Publication date
25 February 2026
Language
EN