Comparative Efficacy of Daratumumab Based Regimens in Patients With Relapsed‐Refractory Multiple Myeloma ( RRMM ) Aged 70 and Above: A Multicenter Study

Read full text
Authors: Razan A. Mansour, Kimberly M. Green, Chandler Graf, Mark Chang, Gray Magee, James A. Davis, Anas Zayad, Nausheen Ahmed, Muhammad Umair Mushtaq, Evguenia Ouchveridze, Zahra Mahmoudjafari, Barry A. Paul
+3 more Nicole Twardowski, Shebli Atrash, Al-Ola A. Abdallah
Cited by: 0
References: 30

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients aged ≥ 70 years with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) face unique challenges due to physiological changes and increased toxicity from treatments. Daratumumab-based regimens have shown efficacy, but direct comparisons in elderly populations are lacking. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective study compared daratumumab, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone (DPd) to daratumumab, carfilzomib, and dexamethasone (DKd) in patients with RRMM aged ≥ 70 years. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), with secondary endpoints including overall survival (OS) and response rates. RESULTS: The study included 150 patients (119 DPd, 31 DKd). Baseline characteristics were similar, but DPd had more lenalidomide-refractory patients (90% vs. 74%, p = 0.035). Overall response rates were comparable (DPd 77%, DKd 74.5%, p = 0.8), but DKd had a significantly higher rate of deep responses (64.5% vs. 36%, p < 0.01). Median PFS was 12 months for DPd and 13 months for DKd (p = 0.6); median OS was 50 months for DPd and 28 months for DKd (p = 0.2). Multivariate analysis identified poor performance status and high-risk cytogenetics as adverse prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: DPd and DKd showed similar efficacy for elderly RRMM patients, with DKd achieving deeper responses. Treatment decisions should consider individual patient factors rather than focusing solely on efficacy differences.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research Bone health and treatments

Publication details

Journal / source
European Journal Of Haematology
Volume
116
Issue
5
Pages
585–595
Publication date
16 January 2026
Language
EN