Reductionism in Engram Neuroscience

Read full text
Authors: Caitlin Mace, Fionn O'Sullivan, Scott R. Wilson
Cited by: 1
References: 129

Abstract

Engrams are a hypothetical construct in neuroscience used to explain memory phenomena. The search for engrams has been energised by the advent of certain reductionist methods that intervene at lower levels of organisation. We defend methodological reductionism as an essential research strategy but argue that such methods alone are insufficient for a complete explanation of memory. Relying solely on these methods perpetuates a field that is data-rich but understanding-poor. Explanations in memory neuroscience require theorising about engrams and the conditions for their discovery. This can be facilitated by an integrative pluralism, by which multiple competing models of causal processes are integrated within a broader theoretical framework. We propose that conceiving of engrams as multiply-realisable, causal motifs-not the standard conceit of a stable, physical entity-is essential for a complete explanation of memory phenomena. As such, methodological reductionism and explanatory integrative pluralism are important conceptual tools in the neuroscientist's toolkit.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Embodied and Extended Cognition Memory and Neural Mechanisms Action Observation and Synchronization

Publication details

Journal / source
European Journal of Neuroscience
Publisher
Wiley
Volume
63
Issue
8
Pages
e70497–e70497
Publication date
1 April 2026
Language
EN