Flux Footprints: A Critical Link to Bridge Eddy‐Covariance Measurements With Models, Remote Sensing, and Other Observations

Read full text
Authors: Housen Chu, Stefan Metzger, Zutao Ouyang, Anne Griebel, Koong Yi, David Durden, Sebastian Wolf, Kuno Kasak, Camilo Rey‐Sanchez, Leila Constanza Hernandez Rodriguez, Patty Oikawa, Nicola Falco
+3 more Benjamin R. K. Runkle, Arman Ahmadi, Jaclyn Matthes
Cited by: 3
References: 247

Abstract

Global networks of eddy-covariance flux towers play a pivotal role in enhancing our predictive understanding of carbon and water cycling of biological systems in response to regional and global environmental change. Despite their broad application in numerous studies, the spatial aspects of the flux measurements have often been ignored or treated ambiguously, thereby remaining a primary source of uncertainty. The area contributing to the flux-referred to as the flux footprint-varies over time depending on wind direction, atmospheric turbulence, effective measurement heights, surface characteristics, and mesoscale forcings. The footprint dynamics, along with underlying source-sink heterogeneity, lead to spatial and temporal variability in the sensed fluxes, complicating the interpretation of flux data and their integration with a range of observations and models. This article addresses this critical link by reviewing the most up-to-date research, identifying knowledge gaps and challenges, and pointing out future research needs and opportunities. We begin with an overview of the current state of footprint modeling and its applications, from single-site studies to large-scale syntheses, summarizing how flux footprints have been used to interpret spatial flux variability and to integrate flux data with models, remote sensing, and other observations. We highlight how this critical spatial aspect could complicate the processing of eddy-covariance fluxes, the definition of mass and energy continuity, and the interpretation of flux response functions and parameters, all of which have significant implications for numerous applications and research. We then point out potential opportunities and future research needs to bridge this knowledge gap, highlighting both readily available and prominent emerging ones. We conclude by urging the scientific community to (re)consider the spatiotemporal dynamics of eddy-covariance flux measurements, and to investigate and evaluate potential approaches across scales, applications, and disciplines.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes Marine and coastal ecosystems

Publication details

Journal / source
Global Change Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
e70887–e70887
Publication date
1 April 2026
Language
EN