Wound Management and Surgery for Calcific Uremic Arteriolopathy (Calciphylaxis): A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study

Read full text
Authors: Scott J Moses, Matthew Supple, Houda Bouchouari, Rosalynn M. Nazarian, Steven Chen, Madeline E. DeWane, Sagar U. Nigwekar, Maureen Walsh McCarthy, Sean A. Hickey, Jeremy Goverman
Cited by: 1
References: 35

Abstract

Wound care in calciphylaxis remains poorly defined without evidence-based consensus on timing and technique of surgical intervention. We demonstrate that surgical debridement and subsequent wound closure are safe and effective in calciphylaxis and describe a systematic multidisciplinary approach to intervention. We retrospectively reviewed a cohort of patients with calciphylaxis at our institution. Those who underwent surgical debridement and wound closure were analysed with emphasis on wound healing, progression to amputation and mortality. Sixty-two patients with calciphylaxis underwent surgical debridement. Twenty patients had wound closure by skin grafting, five were excised with primary wound closure, and 37 were debrided and allowed to heal by secondary intention. There were excellent rates of healing in all groups, and no patients demonstrated wound progression or new lesions following operative intervention. Surgical debridement and wound closure are safe and effective in treating wounds related to calciphylaxis.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments Peripheral Artery Disease Management Dialysis and Renal Disease Management

Publication details

Journal / source
International Wound Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
e70854–e70854
Publication date
27 February 2026
Language
EN