Evaluating Large‐Scale and Lightweight Large Language Models for Traditional Chinese Medicine Exam Questions: A Comparative Study

View at publisher
Authors: Yizhen Li, Shaohan Huang, Jiaxing Qi, Yao Lü, Lei Quan, Dongran Han, Bin Li, Xincan Liu, Zhongzhi Luan
Cited by: 1
References: 18

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) with knowledge-intensive framework poses unique challenges to performance for large language models (LLMs). Although TCM-specific benchmarks and models have been developed, the performance of lightweight LLMs remains insufficiently investigated. This study presents a systematic evaluation and comparison of large-scale and lightweight LLMs to assess their capabilities and deployment trade-offs. METHODS: We developed TCM-related question-answering, a dataset comprising 801 questions derived from TCM textbooks. Eleven LLMs were evaluated under zero-shot and few-shot prompting conditions in both English and Chinese. Performance was primarily measured by accuracy. RESULTS: Large-scale LLMs achieved high accuracy on single-choice (69.01%-90.92%) and true/false questions (52.34%-59.38%) but performed poorly on multiple-choice questions, with a maximum accuracy of only 8.40%. Lightweight LLMs (2.10%-49.48%) generally lagged behind larger LLMs (6.30%-95.07%). However, Qwen3-1.7B (5.92%-54.20%) stood out and even surpassed the domain-specialized TCMChat-7B (2.10%-36.98%). Few-shot prompting enhanced performance in 8/11 (72.7%) of the models, Chinese prompts yielded better results than English in 9/11 (81.8%) of the models. Symptomatic diagnosis emerged as the most challenging reasoning category across all models (16.75%-48.07%). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that although large-scale LLMs exhibit strong knowledge recall in TCM, their suboptimal performance on multiple-choice questions and substantial computational costs may limit their practical applicability in clinical settings. The robust performance of Qwen3-1.7B indicates that effective model optimization and domain-specific training may offer greater advantages than simply increasing model size. While the current evaluation is based on examination-style tasks and does not involve real-world clinical decision-making, our findings provide insights to support the deployment of optimized models in resource-constrained healthcare environments.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies Topic Modeling Machine Learning in Healthcare

Publication details

Journal / source
Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
e70118–e70118
Publication date
11 February 2026
Language
EN