Common, Uncommon Sense: Visiting the Human‐Versus‐AI Argument

View at publisher
Authors: Danish A. Ahmed, Dechang, Michael A. Goldstein, Dalia Stremekiene, Umair Saeed Bhutta
Cited by: 1
References: 38

Abstract

ABSTRACT Contemporary developments have empowered artificial intelligence (AI) to take a generalist approach: a single AI like ChatGPT can now solve problems from diverse fields. Here, we discuss the long‐debated human‐versus‐AI argument through a systematic review of AI literature from 1996–2024. While the strengths of AI are undeniable—it can perform various tasks from different bodies of knowledge more accurately and efficiently than humans—its output is hindered by the explainability of its information processing mechanism also known as explainable AI (XAI). This shortcoming of AI has reduced its feasibility. In the future, humans and AI can work synergistically: AI can support humans by doing tiring work, while humans assume the role of expert by maintaining AI performance and approving (and/or improving) its output.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) Ethics and Social Impacts of AI

Publication details

Journal / source
Journal of Economic Surveys
Publisher
Wiley
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
1706–1722
Publication date
28 January 2026
Language
EN