Outcomes of Liver Transplant Versus Partial Hepatectomy for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma Patients Requiring Arterial Reconstruction

Read full text
Authors: Edoardo Poletto, Pim B. Olthof, Andrea Ruzzenente, Jean‐Philippe Adam, Ian P.J. Alwayn, Emmanuel Boleslawski, Marieke T. de Boer, Alexandre Chébaro, Laurence Chiche, Cristina Dopazo, Jeroen Dubbeld, Joris I. Erdmann
+21 more Abdul Hakeem, Minneke J. Coenraad, Hendrien Kuipers, Jean‐Yves Mabrut, Charlotte Maulat, Shishir K. Maithel, Vincent Erwin de Meijer, Kayvan Mohkam, Sarwa Darwish Murad, Fabrice Muscari, Jens Rolinger, Wojciech Grzegorz Polak, Michel Rayar, Francesca Ratti, Fabien Robin, Andreas A. Schnitzbauer, Ernesto Sparrelid, Frederike G.I. van Vilsteren, Robert J. Porte, Frederik J. H. Hoogwater, Bas Groot Koerkamp
Cited by: 1
References: 32

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Liver resection (LR) and orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) are therapeutic options for locally advanced perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) requiring hepatic artery reconstruction (HAR). This study aimed to compare short- and long-term outcomes of LR and OLT. Outcomes were major vascular complications, 90-day mortality, overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). METHODS: A cohort of patients undergoing LR with HAR from 10 Western centres was compared with an OLT cohort comprising patients who received or did not receive neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACR). RESULTS: 109 patients, 60 LR and 49 OLT (22 OLT no-NACR and 27 OLT NACR) were included. LR patients were older and had fewer Bismuth type 4 tumours (38.3% vs. 69.4%, p = 0.009). Positive margins (49.2% vs. 6.5%, p < 0.001) and lymph nodes (54.2% vs. 32.4%, p = 0.058) were found more frequently in LR patients. No differences were found between LR and OLT in major (40% vs. 46.9%, p = 0.56) and vascular complications (23.3% vs. 28.6%, p = 0.66); NACR was an independent prognostic factor for vascular complications (OR 2.63, 95% CI 1.03-6.70, p = 0.043). 90-day mortality (15% for LR vs. 10.2% for OLT, p = 0.57) and 5-year OS (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.40-1.17, p = 0.17) were similar. Median OS after LR versus OLT was higher but not significant (24 vs. 40 months, p = 0.13). OLT had better 5-year RFS (HR 0.52, 95% CI 0.29-0.96, p = 0.035) than LR. R1 resection (HR 2.07, 95% CI 1.03-4.18, p = 0.041) and perineural invasion (HR 3.64, 95% CI 1.09-12.16, p = 0.035) were independent prognostic factors for RFS. CONCLUSIONS: LR and OLT for locally advanced pCCA had similar rates of major complications and post-operative mortality, but NACR was associated with increased vascular complications. Survival was difficult to compare in the groups due to their heterogeneity, but OLT, especially with NACR, seems to give better results than LR.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes

Publication details

Journal / source
Liver International
Publisher
Wiley
Volume
46
Issue
7
Pages
e70729–e70729
Publication date
21 June 2026
Language
EN