Implementation and Impact of Tele‐Intensive Care Unit (Tele‐ ICU ) Models on Critical Care Outcomes: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Tele-Intensive Care Unit (Tele-ICU) models have expanded rapidly in response to global critical care workforce shortages, rising patient acuity and the demands of the COVID-19 pandemic. Contemporary evidence shows substantial variation in Tele-ICU configurations and outcomes, underscoring the need for an updated synthesis that evaluates clinical, staff-related and system-level effects across diverse settings. AIM: To examine the implementation and impact of Tele-ICU models on critical care outcomes and to compare results across hub-and-spoke, hybrid, consultative and tele-recovery configurations. STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review was conducted and reported according to PRISMA 2020 and Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar were searched for peer-reviewed studies published between January 2020 and October 2025. Owing to heterogeneity in Tele-ICU models, outcomes and effect measures, a narrative synthesis was performed. RESULTS: Sixteen studies published between 2020 and 2025 were included, comprising quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods designs conducted across high-, middle- and low-resource healthcare settings. Overall, Tele-ICU implementation was associated with reductions in ICU and hospital mortality, improved adherence to evidence-based clinical protocols, enhanced interprofessional communication and reduced clinician documentation burden. Hub-and-spoke and hybrid Tele-ICU models demonstrated the most consistent clinical and workforce benefits, whereas consultative and low-cost models primarily improved access to specialist care in resource-limited contexts. Across studies, nursing roles expanded to include digital patient surveillance, tele-round coordination, protocol facilitation and virtual family communication. Evidence regarding long-term sustainability and cost-effectiveness was limited and inconsistently reported. CONCLUSIONS: Tele-ICU models enhance clinical performance, support nursing practice and improve system-level responsiveness across diverse contexts. While benefits are consistent, outcomes vary by model design, local infrastructure and implementation readiness. Longitudinal and economic evaluations are needed to inform sustainable, scalable Tele-ICU strategies. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Tele-ICU models support bedside nurses by improving access to specialist input, strengthening adherence to evidence-based care and enhancing patient safety. Evidence shows that Tele-ICU reduces workload, improves communication and enables nurses to coordinate digital monitoring and family updates, contributing to more consistent and equitable critical care delivery, particularly in high-acuity and resource-limited settings.