Determination of the Minimum Discard Volume in the Extraction of Blood Samples Through Arterial Catheters in Critical Patients

Read full text
Authors: Patricia Morales Fernández, Francisco Javier CASTRO-OLMO, Sara González-Martín, Miguel Serrano Hernández, Manuel Quintana‐Díaz, Víctor Aceña, Estéfani Martínez-Chávez, Belén Fernández-Puntero
Cited by: 1
References: 21

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background The critically ill patient requires multiple extractions through catheters, implying a substantial blood loss. The discard method continues to be a commonly used method in Intensive Care Units. However, there is no homogeneity in practice. Aim Determine the minimum blood discard volume to obtain samples through radial arterial catheter. Study Design Quasi‐experimental, prospective, cross‐sectional study employing the STOBE checklist. Four consecutive arterial blood gases were performed considering the flush volume (sample A with 1 dead space discarding 1 mL, sample B with 2 discard space [2 mL], sample C with 3 discard space [3 mL] and control with 4 discard space [4 mL]). The study was approved by the Ethics and Pharmacological Research Committee of the Research Institute of La paz Hospital (Law No. 2023.564). It was conducted in the Burn Intensive Care Unit and the Resuscitation and Critical Care Unit of La Paz Hospital from September 2023 to June 2024. Results We found values outside the Clinical Acceptance Interval (CAI) in sample A versus control in pCO 2 (47.42%), HCO 3 − (60.71%), Haemoglobin (67.85%), Na 2+ (7.14%), K + (71.42%) and glycaemia (21.42%). In the case of lactate, no values outside the Clinical Acceptance Interval were found. When comparing sample B versus control, we found significant differences in HCO 3 − ( p = 0.027) and glycaemia ( p = 0.001). However, none of the parameters studied presented values outside the Clinical Acceptance Interval. When the results were related to the Reference Value of Change (RVC), the pCO 2 and Haemoglobin values presented 3.57% of values outside the Clinical Acceptance Interval, respectively, although they did not present statistically significant differences ( p > 0.05). When comparing sample C versus control, no significant differences were found in any parameter, nor values outside the Clinical Acceptance Interval. Conclusions The volume of discard required to obtain valid values is twice the volume used to purge the arterial catheterization system (2 mL) for obtaining samples for clinical use. Relevance to Clinical Practice The calculation of the minimum amount of discard in the collection of blood samples through the arterial catheter is an intervention at no extra cost that will reduce iatrogenic anaemia, reducing the need for transfusions, the complications associated with this therapy and the reduction of costs in critically ill patients.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Blood transfusion and management Trauma Hemostasis Coagulopathy Resuscitation Blood donation and transfusion practices

Publication details

Journal / source
Nursing in Critical Care
Publisher
Wiley
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
e70493–e70493
Publication date
15 April 2026
Language
EN