Clinical Trial: Efficacy and Safety of Velusetrag in Chronic Intestinal Pseudo‐Obstruction: A Randomized, Phase 2, Placebo‐Controlled, Crossover, Multiple ( n = 1), Proof‐of‐Concept Study

Read full text
Authors: Carolina Malagelada, Roberto De Giorgio, Rosanna Francesca Cogliandro, Luis Alcalá‐González, Anna Costanzini, Valeria Scuderi, Sara Manzoni, Elena Pasquali, Jan Tack, Vincenzo Stanghellini
Cited by: 1
References: 35

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Chronic intestinal pseudo‐obstruction (CIPO) is a rare, severe disorder of gastrointestinal motility. Although 5‐hydroxytryptamine type 4 (5‐HT 4 ) receptor agonists stimulate gastrointestinal motility, few trials have assessed their therapeutic effects in patients with CIPO. Aim To assess the efficacy and safety of velusetrag, a highly selective 5‐HT 4 receptor agonist, in patients with CIPO. Methods This was a phase 2, placebo‐controlled, crossover, multiple ( n = 1), multicenter, double‐blind, proof‐of‐concept trial. Eligible patients were aged 18–80 years, had CIPO (idiopathic or secondary to neurodegenerative disorders) and received ≥ 30% of their daily caloric intake orally. Over four periods, each of four weeks, patients were randomly assigned to once‐daily, oral velusetrag 15 mg (two periods) or placebo (two periods), with a 2‐week washout between each treatment period. The primary endpoint was the improvement in the weekly global gastrointestinal symptoms average index score (WGGSAIS) from the start to the end of each treatment period, assessed among patients who were responders or naive to previous 5‐HT 4 receptor agonist treatment. Results Overall, 17 patients with idiopathic CIPO received treatment and were included in safety analyses; efficacy was assessed in 15 patients. Mean (standard deviation) changes in WGGSAIS during treatment were −0.42 (0.693) for velusetrag and −0.19 (0.688) for placebo (between‐treatment difference: −0.24; 95% confidence interval: −0.553, 0.074; p = 0.1279). No deaths or serious or treatment‐related treatment‐emergent adverse events were reported. Conclusion Velusetrag treatment was associated with improved symptoms versus placebo, although differences were not statistically significant at this sample size. Velusetrag was generally well tolerated. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05724069; EudraCT number: 2021‐000854‐24

Fields of Study & Subjects

Gastrointestinal motility and disorders Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions

Publication details

Journal / source
Neurogastroenterology & Motility
Publisher
Wiley
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
e70246–e70246
Publication date
1 January 2026
Language
EN