How Stakes Vary and Influence Crisis Decision‐Making: Evidence From Local Government Managers During COVID ‐19

View at publisher
Authors: Søren Kjær Foged, Kurt Houlberg
Cited by: 0
References: 28

Abstract

ABSTRACT How does a crisis influence decision‐making in public organisations? Crisis decision‐making, by definition, occurs under conditions of uncertainty, urgency and high stakes. While high stakes are an inherent feature of any crisis, this article argues that the level of stakes varies, and shapes the decision‐making approach. The literature on crisis decision‐making highlights two key dimensions: a spectrum from principled to pragmatic approaches, and a range from centralised to decentralised decision‐making. Based on survey data from Danish local government managers, the article finds that COVID‐19 decision‐making was more principled and centralised among managers working in high‐stakes policy areas and among those more actively engaged in a central crisis management team. The article theorises and empirically tests how variation in perceived stakes influences crisis decision‐making approaches.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Public Relations and Crisis Communication Disaster Management and Resilience Public Policy and Administration Research

Publication details

Journal / source
Social Policy and Administration
Volume
60
Issue
5
Pages
864–876
Publication date
8 January 2026
Language
EN