Resistance to novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors among carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and clinical implications in the prospective observational Pseudomonas study

Read full text
Authors: Lee S. Gottesdiener, Yixuan Li, Kerryl E. Greenwood‐Quaintance, Lauren Komarow, Cesar A. Arias, Eric Cober, Erica S. Herc, Keith S. Kaye, W. Charles Huskins, Jairo Figueroa, Samuel Vilchez, Bettina C. Fries
+20 more Marcel Leroi, T P McCarty, María L. Rioseco, Jose M. Munita, Martín E. Stryjewski, Jinnethe Reyes, Liang Chen, Barry N. Kreiswirth, Carol Hill, Keri Baum, María Virginia Villegas, David L. Paterson, Robert A. Bonomo, Henry F. Chambers, Vance G. Fowler, Robin Patel, Yohei Doi, David van Duin, Michael J. Satlin, on behalf of the Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group
Cited by: 1
References: 33

Abstract

ABSTRACT Novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (βL/βLIs) are important therapies for carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA). However, the global extent of resistance to these agents and the impact of resistance on patient outcomes are unclear. We therefore evaluated patients with CRPA isolates at 35 hospitals (nine countries) from December 2018 to November 2019. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed at a central laboratory by agar dilution for ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T) and ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) and by broth microdilution for imipenem-relebactam (I/R). Characteristics and outcomes, including desirability of outcome rankings (DOOR), were compared between patients infected with isolates not susceptible vs susceptible to each agent. Of 800 CRPA isolates, susceptibility to C/T, CZA, and I/R was 69%, 67%, and 33%, respectively. USA isolates ( n = 526) were more frequently susceptible to these agents than isolates from other countries ( n = 274; C/T: 83% vs 42%; CZA: 77% vs 47%; I/R: 37% vs 23%; P < 0.001 for each comparison) and isolates with carbapenemases ( n = 157) were less frequently susceptible than isolates without carbapenemases ( n = 643; C/T: 7% vs 84%; CZA: 24% vs 77%; I/R: 6% vs 39%; P < 0.001 for each comparison). Thirty-day mortality and DOOR were similar overall in patients infected with isolates not susceptible vs susceptible to each βL/βLI. However, the adjusted probability of a better DOOR outcome for a randomly selected patient with bacteremia due to a C/T-not susceptible vs -susceptible isolate was 38.2% (95% confidence interval, 25.6%–52.7%). Resistance to novel βL/βLIs, especially I/R, is common in CRPA, particularly outside the USA and in carbapenemase-producing isolates. Additional treatment options are needed for CRPA infections.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria Antibiotic Use and Resistance Infections and bacterial resistance

Publication details

Journal / source
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Publisher
American Society for Microbiology
Volume
70
Issue
6
Pages
e0038825–e0038825
Publication date
15 May 2026
Language
EN