Modifiers of the effectiveness of point-of-care troponin testing and determinants of concordance between diagnostic pathway recommendations and disposition in patients with chest pain: a post hoc analysis of a randomised controlled trial

Read full text
Authors: Viola I L Thulin, Gard M. S. Myrmel, Silje Marie Farestveit Jordalen, Ole Christian Lekven, Jeyaseelan Krishnapillai, Ole‐Thomas Steiro, Richard M. Body, Paul O. Collinson, Fred S. Apple, Louise Cullen, Tone M. Norekvål, Torbjørn Fosen Wisløff
+4 more Kjell Vikenes, Rune Oskar Bjørneklett, Torbjørn Omland, Kristin Moberg Aakre
Cited by: 0
References: 24

Abstract

Introduction While point-of-care (POC) high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) testing has the potential to reduce emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS), evidence of real world effectiveness is lacking. Our objective was to examine factors that influence the real world effectiveness of POC hs-cTn-based accelerated diagnostic protocols (ADPs) in reducing ED LOS. Methods This is a post hoc analysis from the “Aiming towards evidence-based interpretation of cardiac biomarkers in patients presenting with chest pain using POC testing” (WESTCOR-POC) study which included 1494 consecutive patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome presenting to the ED at a moderately sized hospital in Norway. Patients were randomised to receive hs-cTn measurements at admission and after 1 hour either by POC or central laboratory testing. This post hoc analysis examines factors affecting the effectiveness of a POC-based ADP and predictors of non-ADP-concordant disposition. Both outcomes were assessed using regression models, with significance level set at p60 years (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.4 to 3.7, p=0.001), high triage category (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.2 to 3.0, p=0.003) and suspected serious differential diagnosis (OR 5.9, 95% 3.5 to 9.9, p

Fields of Study & Subjects

Acute Myocardial Infarction Research Emergency and Acute Care Studies Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control

Publication details

Journal / source
Emergency Medicine Journal
Volume
43
Issue
11
Pages
699–707
Publication date
25 February 2026
Language
EN