IDDF2026-ABS-0439 An asia pacific multicenter prospective study to compare the diagnostic accuracy of bacterial gene markers and fecal immunochemical test for advanced colorectal neoplasia

Read full text
Authors: Min Dai, Louis Ho-Shing Lau, Murdani Abdullah, Naoki Sugimura, Daizen Hirata, Yasushi Sano, Chin Kimg Tan, Tiing Leong Ang, Wei‐Yuan Chang, Han‐Mo Chiu, Karnwara Thanyawan, Sakkarin Chirapongsathorn
+3 more Jessica Yuet–Ling Ching, F K Chan, Siew C. Ng
Cited by: 1

Abstract

Background Fecal immunochemical test (FIT) based colorectal cancer screening has limited sensitivity for advanced colorectal neoplasia. We compared its diagnostic performance with a stool-based bacterial gene marker panel (M3). Methods This investigator-initiated, international, multicenter, prospective study (NCT05405673) included adult participants from six centers in the Asia-Pacific region who underwent colonoscopies for screening, surveillance, or diagnostic purposes. Baseline data and stool samples were collected before bowel preparation, with antibiotics and probiotics prohibited. Colonoscopy findings were confirmed by histopathology evaluated by independent pathologists. Quantitative FIT was performed in local centers, while preserved stool samples were sent to a centralized laboratory for microbiological analysis. The relative abundances of four bacterial gene markers– Fusobacterium nucleatum (Fn), Bacteroides clarus (Bc), Clostridium hathewayi (Ch), and Lachnoclostridium (m3) were measured using quantitative PCR. The M3 test was a combined risk score with four bacterial gene markers and FIT using logistic regression. The primary outcome was the sensitivity of the M3 test compared with FIT in detecting advanced colorectal neoplasia, defined as CRC or advanced adenoma (AA). Results Between June 2022 and December 2025, 2,575 participants were recruited, of whom 2,108 (81.8%) were included in the analysis. There were 72 (3.4%) CRC, 178 (8.4%) AA, 758 (36.0%) non-advanced adenoma (NAA), and 1,100 (52.2%) normal or non-neoplastic findings (IDDF2026-ABS-0439 Figure 1). The M3 test showed a higher sensitivity than FIT (55.2% vs. 45.2%, difference 10.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 6.3–13.7, p

Fields of Study & Subjects

Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection Gut microbiota and health

Publication details

Journal / source
Clinical Gastroenterology
Publisher
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and British Society of Gastroenterology
Pages
A488–A489
Publication date
1 June 2026