Using social media to highlight inhaled occupational exposures as a cause of lung disease

Read full text
Authors: David Fishwick, Sara De Matteis, Martie J A van Tongeren, E J Thompson, Dick J. J. Heederik, Saskia Weldam, E. Szmytke, Jessica Denning, Andrew Curran, Pippa Powell
Cited by: 1
References: 13

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The risks to lung health from workplace hazards remain incompletely understood and may still be overlooked by workers, employers and healthcare professionals. We used an online tool to collect European population-based data relating to workplace exposures, training and lung health. METHODS: A targeted industry-specific digital tool, enquiring about the link between respiratory symptoms and work, was made accessible online over a 24-month period. RESULTS: 22 393 individuals (mean age 43.6 years) responded; 55.7% were female, 46.7% completed in English, 19.9% in Portuguese, 17.8% in French, 10.5% in Dutch and 5% in German. 47% reported nasal symptoms, 42% cough, 21% chest tightness and 20% wheeze. 8412 (37.6%) reported at least one work-related symptom. The use of workplace training (11%) and guidance (17%) to prevent respiratory ill health was uncommon. 980 (5.9%) had changed their job because it had affected their breathing. Increasing age (OR 1.02 per year age increase), completion language (English (OR 0.66), French (OR 0.39)), workplace (bakery (OR 1.64), mine (OR 1.91), sports centre (OR 3.03) and farm (OR 1.77)) and workplace training (OR 0.71) were significantly associated with this outcome. These workers also had more work-related symptoms (p

Fields of Study & Subjects

Occupational exposure and asthma Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research

Publication details

Journal / source
Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Publisher
BMJ
Volume
83
Issue
4
Pages
217–222
Publication date
10 June 2026
Language
EN