Martian chronology

View at publisher
Authors: Hunter R. Edwards, Joseph E. Gutierrez, James M. D. Day
Cited by: 1
References: 167

Abstract

Martian chronology is currently constrained using crater counting methodologies, in situ measurements onboard the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) Curiosity rover, and significantly more precise radiometric isotope age measurements of meteorite samples. Each methodology has advantages and drawbacks. These include uncertainties surrounding crater counting accuracy and in situ ages from MSL, and the lack of field context and two age paradoxes associated with meteorite samples. Martian crater counting is calibrated to the less-than-certain lunar crater counting chronology, and in situ ages on Mars are difficult to calibrate to provide precise or accurate dates. The martian meteorite ‘surface age’ paradox details the observation that despite significant surface area on Mars with Hesperian ages (3.7–3.0 Ga), there are no meteorites with crystallization ages from this period. The other martian meteorite paradox, the ‘ancient Pb age’ paradox, is the discrepancy in relatively young shergottite crystallization ages (4 Ga) from U–Th–Pb isotope systematics. The Mars Sample Return mission from Jezero crater holds great importance for the chronology of Mars, with its potential to elucidate the caveats within each of these chronology methods.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Planetary Science and Exploration Astro and Planetary Science Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma

Publication details

Journal / source
Geological Society London Special Publications
Publisher
Geological Society of London
Volume
562
Issue
1
Publication date
11 February 2026
Language
EN