The Genomic Landscape of MYC -, MYCL -, and MYCN -Amplified Solid Tumors

View at publisher
Authors: Matteo Repetto, Allison L. Richards, Monica F. Chen, Pier Selenica, Shalabh Suman, Yingjie Zhu, Clare Wilhelm, Adam Price, Soo‐Ryum Yang, Justin Wahl, Zachary Hornby, Peter Krein
+15 more Christian A. Hassig, Jason C. Chang, Angela Rose Brannon, Ezra Y. Rosen, David N. Brown, Jorge Sergio Reis-Filho, Nitya Prabhakar Raj, Charles M. Rudin, Mark G. Kris, Andrea Ventura, Michael F. Berger, Britta Weigelt, Alexander Edward Dela Cruz Drilon, Noura J. Choudhury, Mark T.A. Donoghue
Cited by: 1
References: 34

Abstract

PURPOSE: MYC, MYCN, and MYCL amplifications are recurrent oncogenic events across solid tumors. Currently, no standardized selection biomarker is available to identify patients with MYC-dependent tumors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We analyzed copy-number alterations of MYC family genes and their features in more than 68,000 tumor-normal paired samples from pediatric and adult patients sequenced with MSK-IMPACT (Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets) and annotated with FACETS (Fraction and Allele-Specific Copy Number Estimates from Tumor Sequencing). The relationship between amplification features and MYC mRNA expression levels were evaluated in more than 10,000 samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). RESULTS: Across MSK Cancer Center samples, MYC amplifications were most common, found in 2,949 samples compared with 310 in MYCL and 217 in MYCN. Although MYCN and MYCL amplifications were predominantly focal (10 Mb, 62%). Although most tumor types showed similar features between broad and focal amplifications of MYC, in select cancer types, we identified differing co-occurrence and mutual exclusivity patterns with other disease-specific drivers. Furthermore, although MYC-amplified TCGA samples showed higher mRNA expression than wild-type ones, the focality of MYC amplification was seen to have limited influence on expression levels. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that MYC dependency likely depends on many factors, including, but not limited to, total copy number of the detected amplification, lineage-specific factors, concomitant presence or absence of additional oncogenic alterations, and in some cases amplification focality.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics

Publication details

Journal / source
Clinical Cancer Research
Publisher
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Volume
32
Issue
18
Pages
4124–4135
Publication date
24 June 2026
Language
EN