Abstract PD7-05: Gut Microbiota Signatures are Associated with Response in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Standard Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

View at publisher
Authors: Ariel Alejandro Aptekmann, L. L. Montgomery, Iriana Colorado, Kira Goldgirsh, Enrique Corapi, S. Hyman, M. Brito, C. McGuire, A. Akand, R. L. Mehta, R. Carbone, Michelle Zupa
+7 more M. Davidson, C. Isaacs, Candace Bavette Mainor, Deena Mary Atieh Graham, M. J. Goldfischer, Lajos Pusztai, Rena Feinman
Cited by: 0

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Our understanding of the microbiome’s role in cancer has expanded significantly, revealing how differences in the diversity and composition of gut microbiota contribute to the variability in treatment responses among cancer patients. Its role in driving triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and resistance to immunotherapy is still not fully understood. We hypothesized that dysbiosis (loss of diversity, depletion of beneficial obligate anaerobes, blooms of pathobionts) in TNBC is associated with poor treatment response. Methods: From August 2017 to June 2025, 49 newly diagnosed TNBC patients (median age, 52 years) undergoing standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) were enrolled in an observational prospective study at 3 sites, Hackensack University Medical Center-John Theurer Cancer Center, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center and Yale Cancer Center. Stool samples were collected from patients before, during and after NAC (prior to surgery). Shallow shotgun sequencing was performed and annotated taxonomically using MetaPhlAn v4.1. Treatment response criteria included pathologic complete response (pCR) and residual cancer burden (RCB). Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) of stool samples from responders and non-responders was performed in antibiotic-treated C57BL/6 mice using the E0771 TNBC model. Each donor stool was given to 3-4 recipients. Results: To assess whether microbial dysbiosis predicts early relapse and impacts response after NAC, we compared gut microbiota profiles at diagnosis in responders (RCB-0, pCR) and non-responders (RCB-II, non-pCR). Using pairwise comparisons (adj p4) in non-responders. In contrast, beneficial gut commensals including short chain fatty acid (SCFA) producers, Lachnospira pectinoschiza (FC>10), a novel pectin degrading bacterium, and Bilophila wadsworthia (FC>14), were more prevalent in responders. Having identified distinct gut microbiota profiles predictive of outcome at diagnosis, we assessed whether NAC modulated the composition of gut microbiota in responders and non-responders. Taxa associated with favorable outcomes (Eubacterium ramulus (FC>74), Subdoligranulum sp. (FC>4), Peptoniphilus (FC>29)) were identified in responders whereas immunosuppressive bacteria (e.g. Enterocloster asparagiformis (FC>12)) were abundant in non-responders after NAC. Random Forest classifier and SHapley Additive exPlanations (post-hoc explainability method) validated the contribution of both pre- and post-bacterial taxa to outcome. To establish causality, we humanized antibiotic-treated mice with stool contents collected from responders and non-responders (pre-NAC). E0771-mice transplanted with stool contents from non-responders had higher tumor volumes (n=3 donors,1929 mm3 ± 244.7, donors) compared to mice transplanted from responders (n=2 donors, 1365 mm3 ± 131.6) after 25 days (p

Fields of Study & Subjects

Gut microbiota and health Breast Cancer Treatment Studies Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers

Publication details

Journal / source
Clinical Cancer Research
Volume
32
Issue
4_Supplement
Pages
PD7–05
Publication date
17 February 2026
Language
EN