Abstract PS4-05-01: Postpartum Associated Breast Cancer and Its Survival Impact among Young Women

View at publisher
Authors: Benjamín Walbaum, A. Morell, Javier Muñoz-Carrillo, L. Arenas, A. Del Val, M. Rey, Pol Giménez‐Xavier, Núria Chic, Fara Brasó‐Maristany, Elia Seguí, R Gómez-Bravo, Isabel García-Fructuoso
+10 more T. Pascual, F. Schettini, Milana A. Bergamino, M. González-Rodríguez, Bárbara Adamo, M. Muñoz, E. Sanfeliu, Aleix Prat, Olga Martínez‐Sáez, M. Vidal
Cited by: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background: Over half of women diagnosed with breast cancer (BC) before the age of 45 fall within the postpartum window, generally defined as a diagnosis made up to 10 years after last delivery. Postpartum has been associated with poorer outcomes and may be a key determinant of the worst prognosis described among young BC patients. Diagnostic delays and biological changes in tumor microenvironment could explain this increased risk. Moreover, delayed childbearing can intensify the postpartum risk and forestall the long-term protective effects of pregnancy. We herein present a retrospective analysis of postpartum-associated BC (PPBC) from a single institution. Methods: Retrospective analysis including a cohort of 223 women under 45 years diagnosed at the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona (2010-2023) with complete pregnancy history. Patients were stratified into PPBC (n=113) defined as BC diagnosed postpartum and up to 10 years after last delivery, and non-PPBC (n=110), either nulliparous or diagnosed after 10 years of last delivery. Analyses evaluated disease-free survival (DFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and overall survival (OS) in early-stage patients. Subgroup analyses in PPBC explored the effect of time since delivery (30 years). PAM50/PROSIGNA was used to determine intrinsic subtypes and risk of recurrence (ROR). Clinicopathological features and survival outcomes were analysed using Chi-square tests, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox regression models. Results: PPBC cases were slightly older at diagnosis than non-PPBC (median 38.0 vs. 36.8 years, p=0.017). Stage distribution was similar, though stage IV disease at diagnosis was numerically higher in PPBC (9.7% [n=11] vs. 5.5% [n=6], p=0.262). Immunohistochemistry (IHC)-based subtypes were comparable (p=0.857), with 59.3% of PPBC and 57.3% of non-PPBC patients having estrogen receptor-positive /HER2-negative (ER+/HER2−) subtype. No other significant differences were observed regarding tumor size, nodal status, histologic type or grade, or Ki67 index. Among patients with available PROSIGNA (n=65; 35 PPBC and 30 non-PPBC), no significant differences for intrinsic subtypes (p=0.892) or ROR categories (p=0.344) were found. At a median follow-up of 85 months, 7-year DFS and DDFS were numerically lower in PPBC compared to non-PPBC (DFS: 75.1% vs. 83.3%; DDFS: 76.2% vs. 89.5%), though only DDFS approached statistical significance (hazard ratio [HR] 1.90, 95% CI 0.976-3.702; p=0.054). Noteworthy, OS was significantly reduced in PPBC patients (7-year OS: 89.6% vs. 95.6%; HR 3.01, 95% CI 1.00-9.79; p=0.042), with persisting differences in the full cohort including de novo stage IV cases (HR 3.4, 95% CI 1.23-9.38; p=0.01). Within PPBC, those diagnosed

Fields of Study & Subjects

Breast Cancer Treatment Studies Cancer Risks and Factors BRCA gene mutations in cancer

Publication details

Journal / source
Clinical Cancer Research
Volume
32
Issue
4_Supplement
Pages
PS4–05
Publication date
17 February 2026
Language
EN