Abstract PS4-07-03: Adverse Events in Neoadjuvant Therapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Phase III Trials
Abstract
Abstract Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for 15-20% of breast cancers and lacks expression of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2, limiting targeted options. Recent neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) advances include immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and PARP inhibitors, improving pathologic complete response (pCR) and survival but raising concerns about severe toxicity. Despite broader adoption of these regimens, a systematic analysis of Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) from contemporary phase III trials is lacking. Methods: We conducted a PRISMA-guided systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO: CRD42024562785). MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane were searched for phase III randomized trials (Jan 2010-Jun 2025) evaluating NAT in non-metastatic TNBC and reporting Grade ≥3 AEs (CTCAE). One phase II trial (WSG-ADAPT-TN; n=336) with robust comparative design and AE reporting was also included. Pooled prevalence and risk ratios (RR) with 95% CI were calculated using DerSimonian-Laird random-effects models. Subgroup analyses included: Group A (PARP inhibitors), B (immunotherapy), and C (platinum-based regimens). Heterogeneity was assessed via I2. Results: Six trials with 3,316 TNBC patients were included (BrighTNess, IMpassion031, KEYNOTE-522, NeoTRIP, PARTNER, WSG-ADAPT-TN). Neutropenia was the most common Grade ≥3 AE, highest with immunotherapy (33.5%), followed by PARP inhibitors (23.7%) and platinum regimens (16.0%) (Q=71.8, p
Fields of Study & Subjects
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
PARP inhibition in cancer therapy
Publication details
- Journal / source
- Clinical Cancer Research
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 4_Supplement
- Pages
- PS4–07
- Publication date
- 17 February 2026
- Language
- EN