Abstract PS5-04-19: 70-gene signature high risk classification provides stronger prognostic value than histologic grade in hr+ her2- early breast cancer

View at publisher
Authors: E. F. Cobain, Lajos Pusztai, C. L. Graham, Peter D. Beitsch, C. R. C. Osborne, R. Layeequr Rahman, N. M. Johnson, Adam Brufsky, R. L. Mahtani, VK Gadi, Kent F. Hoskins, H. M. Linden
+13 more R. A. Mukhtar, E. A. Brown, L. P. Gold, J. Alberty, Sam Benjamin, S. Lee, James V. Pellicane, Harshini Ramaswamy, R. Weber, Nicole Stivers, A. Menicucci, William M. Audeh, Joyce O’Shaughnessy
Cited by: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background: Pivotal trials of immunotherapy and CDK4/6 inhibitors in early-stage hormone-receptor positive (HR+) HER2 negative (HER2–) breast cancer (BC) relied on histologic grade 3 to define high-risk disease, despite its variability and limited prognostic accuracy. The 70-gene MammaPrint® (MP) signature provides a genomic recurrence risk assessment and guides treatment. Patients (pts) classified as MP High Risk are typically recommended chemotherapy (CT). We evaluated distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) in CT-treated HR+HER2– pts classified as MP High Risk, further stratified into High Risk 1 (H1) and High Risk 2 (H2). We also compared MP risk groups with clinicopathologic factors, especially histologic grade, to assess prognostic value. Methods: This is part of the prospective, observational FLEX Study (NCT03053193), including pts with stage I–III disease who underwent MP testing and consented to transcriptome and clinical data collection. Pts with HR+HER2– genomic High Risk BC who received CT and had follow-up data were included (n=1407). Kaplan–Meier (KM) survival analyses were performed, with median follow-up of 3.2 yrs. DRFS was the primary endpoint per STEEP 2.0. Cox proportional hazards models assessed how grade (G), tumor (T) size, lymph node (LN), and menopausal status compared to MP risk stratification. Results: Of 1407 pts, 74% had H1 and 26% H2 BC. Pts with H2 BC were younger (mean 55 vs 58 yrs, p=0.004), more often G3 (62% vs 24%), and had larger tumors, while LN and menopausal status were similar. KM analyses showed pts with H2 BC had worse DRFS at 5 yrs (86.4, 95% CI 82.4–90.6) vs H1 (93.1, 95% CI 91.1–95.2), a diff of 6.7% (p

Fields of Study & Subjects

Breast Cancer Treatment Studies BRCA gene mutations in cancer Breast Lesions and Carcinomas

Publication details

Journal / source
Clinical Cancer Research
Volume
32
Issue
4_Supplement
Pages
PS5–04
Publication date
17 February 2026
Language
EN