Impact of TAVR Failure Mechanism on Outcomes After Reintervention: From the EXPLANTORREDO-TAVR Registry

View at publisher
Authors: Bhavanadhar Penta, Gilbert H.L. Tang, Mohamed Abdel‐Wahab, Rik Adrichem, Hasan Ahmad, Martin Andreas, Anita Asgar, Igor Belluschi, Walid Ben-Ali, Oliver Bhadra, Anson Cheung, Andrea Colli
+49 more Lenard Conradi, Silvia Corona, Ole De Backer, Paolo Denti, Nimesh D. Desai, Marco Di Eusanio, J. Michael DiMaio, John K. Forrest, Shinichi Fukuhara, Arnar Geirsson, Sachin S. Goel, Joshua B Goldberg, C Hagl, Howard C. Herrmann, Thijmen W. Hokken, Jörg Kempfert, Philipp Kiefer, Neal S. Kleiman, Chad Kliger, Markus Mach, Mateo Marín-Cuartas, David Meier, T Modine, George Petrossian, Luigi Pirelli, Basel Ramlawi, Newell Robinson, Joshua D. Rovin, Hendrik Ruge, Shekhar Saha, Christian C. Schults, Emily Shih, Molly Szerlip, Maurizio Taramasso, Axel Unbehaun, Nicolas Van Mieghem, Keti Vitanova, Ron Waksman, Lin Wang, J G Webb, Moritz Wyler von Ballmoos, Michael J. Reardon, Tamim Nazif, Martin B. Leon, Michael J. Mack, Tsuyoshi Kaneko, Vinayak Bapat, Syed Zaid, On behalf of the EXPLANTORREDO-TAVR Registry Investigators
Cited by: 3
References: 16

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) expands to patients with longer life expectancy, the impact of failure mechanisms on outcomes of TAVR-explant and redo-TAVR remains uncertain. We sought to evaluate outcomes of TAVR reintervention based on the failure mechanism of the index transcatheter aortic valve. METHODS: From 2009 to 2022, 553 patients from 29 centers in the EXPLANTORREDO-TAVR registry (Explant or Redo Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement) underwent TAVR-explant or redo-TAVR for transcatheter aortic valve failure. Patients with endocarditis were excluded. Patients with structural valve deterioration (SVD, N=224 [64.9%]) were compared with those with nonstructural valve dysfunction (NSVD, N=121 [35.1%]), comprising paravalvular leak (86.0%) and prosthesis-patient mismatch (14.0%). Outcomes were assessed at 30 days and 1 year. RESULTS: Mean age was 75.6±9.3 years, with 42% women. There were no differences in reintervention type between groups (redo-TAVR in 58.0% SVD versus 49.6% NSVD; TAVR-explant: 42.0% versus 50.4%; P =0.14). Compared with NSVD, SVD was the predominant mode of failure in balloon-expandable valves (50.7% versus 24.8%; P

Fields of Study & Subjects

Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments Congenital Heart Disease Studies Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices

Publication details

Journal / source
Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Volume
19
Issue
6
Pages
e016068–e016068
Publication date
15 April 2026
Language
EN