Early Feasibility Study of a Novel Mechanical Circulatory Support Device for High-Risk PCI

Read full text
Authors: Kevin Croce, Ajay J Kirtane, Matthias Götberg, David E. Kandzari, Brian Bergmark, Hector E. Tamez, Margaret McEntagart, Andrew J P Klein, Rafael Soares Cavalcante, Robert Yeh
Cited by: 1
References: 4

Abstract

Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices provide hemodynamic stability during high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions (HR-PCI), potentially reducing the incidence of adverse events and permitting more complete revascularization.1,2 According to clinical guidelines in the United States, MCS is recommended during PCI for selected high-risk patients undergoing coronary artery revascularization (class IIb, level of evidence B).3 Current MCS devices have limitations related to device migration, hemolysis, and access site vascular and bleeding complications. The CHIP-BCIS3 trial (N=300) found that routine Impella CP use during complex high-risk PCI in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction did not improve composite outcomes over 22 months (win ratio, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.63–1.15]; P=0.30) compared with standard care, and showed a trend toward higher mortality and periprocedural injury, highlighting the need for optimized MCS-supported PCI options.4

Fields of Study & Subjects

Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies

Publication details

Journal / source
Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Volume
19
Issue
7
Pages
e016457–e016457
Publication date
1 May 2026
Language
EN