Determining the Physiological Threshold for Angina (ORBITA-FIRE): A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Study

Read full text
Authors: Fiyyaz Ahmed‐Jushuf, Michael J. Foley, Shayna Chotai, Christopher A. Rajkumar, Danqi Wang, Florentina A. Simader, Krzysztof Macierzanka, Kayla Chiew, Sannidhya Misra, Rupert Williams, Klio Konstantinou, Jehangir N. Din
+18 more Shah R. Mohdnazri, Peter D. O’Kane, Peter Haworth, Sukhjinder S. Nijjer, Henry Seligman, Thomas R. Keeble, John R. Davies, Gerald Clesham, Jonathan Hinton, James Spratt, Jason N. Dungu, Daniel Knight, Tushar Kotecha, Frank E. Harrell, James P. Howard, Darrel P. Francis, Matthew J. Shun-Shin, Rasha K. Al-Lamee
Cited by: 1
References: 61

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In stable coronary artery disease, the primary goal of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is symptom relief. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) and nonhyperemic pressure ratios such as resting full-cycle ratio (RFR) are used to guide revascularization. Although these indices correlate with myocardial ischemia, they have never been validated against the onset of angina. The physiological thresholds for angina, FFR angina and RFR angina , at rest and during exercise remain undefined. METHODS: ORBITA-FIRE (Finding the Invasive Threshold for Symptom Relief in Exertional Angina) was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study in patients with stable angina and single-vessel coronary artery disease. After imaging-guided PCI, an in-stent balloon was incrementally inflated until angina occurred at rest. This angina threshold was verified against placebo inflation, and corresponding FFR angina and RFR angina values were recorded at symptom onset. The protocol was repeated during low- and high-intensity exercise to assess changes in angina thresholds with increasing cardiac workload. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were enrolled (mean age, 63.9±8.7 years; 74% male; 69% hypertensive; 23% diabetic; 91% with Canadian Cardiovascular Society class II–III angina). Median pre-PCI FFR was 0.59 (interquartile range [IQR], 0.46–0.70) and RFR was 0.61 (IQR, 0.40–0.82). Median FFR angina at rest was 0.29 (IQR, 0.23–0.35), increasing to 0.38 (IQR, 0.30–0.48) during low-intensity exercise and 0.45 (IQR, 0.36–0.55) during high-intensity exercise. RFR angina similarly increased from 0.22 (IQR, 0.16–0.30) at rest to 0.26 (IQR, 0.18–0.36) and 0.32 (IQR, 0.23–0.46) during low- and high-intensity exercise. All thresholds were significantly lower than clinical diagnostic cut points ( P

Fields of Study & Subjects

Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics Pain Management and Treatment Cardiac Health and Mental Health

Publication details

Journal / source
Circulation
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Volume
153
Issue
23
Pages
1795–1812
Publication date
8 May 2026
Language
EN