Ascending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms in a Veterans Affairs Health System: Longitudinal Outcomes and Risk Factors

Read full text
Authors: Axel Gomez, William P. Carroway, Sally Tu, Vidur Kailash, Liang Ge, Marko T. Boskovski, Elaine E. Tseng
Cited by: 1
References: 28

Abstract

Background The decision to perform ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm (ATAA) repair is primarily guided by diameter thresholds, but the optimal timing remains debated. We aimed to analyze ATAA outcomes in a large cohort of veterans. Methods Retrospective cohort study of patients with ATAA with diameter≥4.0 cm under surveillance between 1998 and 2024. Outcomes included surgical repair, all‐cause mortality, and aortic events. Fine–Gray competing risks regression evaluated the association of baseline diameter with all‐cause mortality, adjusting for age, hypertension, smoking, heart failure, and aortic valve phenotype. Results are reported as adjusted subdistribution hazard ratios (aSHRs) with 95% CIs. Results We included 764 veterans (98.0% male) with median (interquartile range) age of 75.0 (9.3) years, and ATAA diameter of 4.40 (0.50) cm. Median follow‐up was 5.4 (6.2) years. Surgical repair occurred in 86/764 patients (11.3%). Aortic dissection occurred in 2 patients (0.3%), both within the 4.0 to 4.5 cm group. All‐cause mortality rates were 2.83 (2.23–3.59), 3.22 (2.47–4.21), 5.82 (3.91–8.67), and 24.6 (12.2–54.1) deaths per 100 person‐years for ATAA diameters 4.0 to 4.4, 4.5 to 4.9, 5.0 to 5.4, and ≥5.5 cm, respectively ( P

Fields of Study & Subjects

Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches Aortic aneurysm repair treatments Tracheal and airway disorders

Publication details

Journal / source
Journal of the American Heart Association
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
e044959–e044959
Publication date
14 January 2026
Language
EN