Abstract WP146: White Matter Disease and Recurrent Stroke in ESUS: A Propensity-Weighted Analysis from the CASPR Registry

View at publisher
Authors: Farid Khasiyev, Alireza Borghei, Marissa D’Souza, Christina M. Lineback, Deborah L.G. Kerrigan, Kelsey Eklund, Shadi R. Yaghi, Emiliya Melkumova, Collin J. Culbertson, Dinesh V. Jillella, Patrick A. Glover, Hassan Aboul Nour
+27 more Fadi B. Nahab, Mahan Shahrivari, Simona Nedelcu, David S. Liebeskind, Aaron Rothstein, Alicia M. Zha, Sami Al Kasab, Mudassir Farooqui, Diana Rojas-Soto, Yasmin Ninette Aziz, Franziska Herpich, Thanh Ngoc Nguyen, James R. Brorson, Wayneho Kam, Oana Dumitrascu, Muhammad Alvi, Balaji Krishnaiah, Setareh Salehi Omran, Guillermo Linares, Russell J. Van Coevering, Mary Penckofer, Jesse M. Thon, Shani Peter, Adam de Havenon, Richa Sharma, Matthew Smith, James Ernest Siegler
Cited by: 0

Abstract

Background: Embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) comprises infarct mechanisms presumed to be embolic and non-lacunar. One explanation for the lack of superiority of anticoagulation over aspirin is the inclusion of subcortical infarcts with white matter disease (WMD), reflecting small vessel pathology. We hypothesized that WMD is associated with recurrent ischemic stroke (RIS) in ESUS and this risk is not lessened by anticoagulation. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of the multicenter Cardiac Abnormalities in Stroke Prevention and Recurrence (CASPR) registry, including ESUS patients from 27 U.S. centers (2015–2024). WMD severity was graded using the Fazekas scale from MRI and dichotomized as mild (0–1) vs. moderate-to-severe (2–3). The primary outcome was RIS. Secondary outcomes were major bleeding and all-cause mortality. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) adjusted for baseline differences. Cox proportional hazards models assessed associations between WMD and outcomes. Subgroup analyses explored effect modification by age, risk factors, and treatment type. Results: Among 1,890 ESUS patients with MRI data, 684 (36.2%) had Fazekas 2–3. These patients were older with more vascular risk factors, but IPTW achieved covariate balance. In the weighted cohort, RIS occurred more frequently in Fazekas 2–3 vs. 0–1 (7.1% vs. 4.6%/year; HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.10–2.22, p = 0.01). Major bleeding and mortality were similar (bleeding: 1.7% vs. 1.8%/yr, HR 0.96, p = 0.92; death: 7.0% vs. 6.7%/yr, HR 1.04, p = 0.81). Subgroup analyses showed no interaction between WMD and age, vascular risk factors, or treatment type (antiplatelet vs. anticoagulation), suggesting consistent RIS risk in those with higher WMD. Discussion: Moderate-to-severe WMD identifies ESUS patients at higher risk of ischemic stroke recurrence, with no mitigation by anticoagulation. These findings suggest that WMD may indicate non-embolic mechanisms and support the use of imaging-based risk stratification in ESUS.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Acute Ischemic Stroke Management Cerebrovascular and genetic disorders Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases

Publication details

Journal / source
Stroke
Volume
57
Issue
Suppl_1
Publication date
29 January 2026
Language
EN