Anthropomimetic Uncertainty: What Verbalized Uncertainty in Language Models is Missing

Read full text
Authors: Dennis Ulmer, Alexandra Lorson, Ivan S. Titov, Christian Hardmeier
Cited by: 0
References: 224

Abstract

Abstract Human users increasingly communicate with large language models (LLMs), but LLMs suffer from frequent overconfidence in their output, even when its accuracy is questionable, which undermines their trustworthiness and perceived legitimacy. Therefore, there is a need for language models to signal their confidence in order to reap the benefits of human-machine collaboration and mitigate potential harms. Verbalized uncertainty is the expression of confidence with linguistic means, an approach that integrates perfectly into language-based interfaces. Most recent research in natural language processing (NLP) overlooks the nuances surrounding human uncertainty communication and the biases that influence the communication of and with machines. We argue for anthropomimetic uncertainty, the principle that intuitive and trustworthy uncertainty communication requires a degree of imitation of human linguistic behaviors. We present a thorough overview of the research in human uncertainty communication, survey ongoing research in NLP, and perform additional analyses to demonstrate so-far underexplored biases in verbalized uncertainty. We conclude by pointing out unique factors in human-machine uncertainty and outlining future research directions towards implementing anthropomimetic uncertainty. kaleidophon/anthropomimetic-uncertainty

Fields of Study & Subjects

Natural Language Processing Techniques

Publication details

Journal / source
Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
Publisher
MIT Press
Volume
14
Pages
1505–1540
Publication date
1 January 2026
Language
EN