Toxicity as Radical Ambiguity: the Role of the “Toxic” in Žižek’s Philosophical Landscape

View at publisher
Authors: Giorgio Armato
Cited by: 0

Abstract

Abstract This paper examines the concept of toxicity in Slavoj Žižek’s work, arguing that it is not merely a social pathology but a structural necessity embedded in ontology, ideology, and subjectivity. Rather than an external disturbance, toxicity reveals an irreducible excess – the remainder of the Real – that both sustains and destabilizes ideological formations. By linking toxicity to Lacanian jouissance and Hegelian negativity, Žižek demonstrates how compulsive repetition, dependency, and self-destructive enjoyment are inherent to ideological and libidinal economies. Just as the primordial void fails to maintain a state of equilibrium, the subject and social structures alike are marked by an internal dissonance that resists closure. This paper explores how Žižek’s framework challenges moralistic attempts to purify the social field, emphasizing instead that toxicity is constitutive of subjectivity itself. Engaging with his work allows for a deeper interrogation of the limits of ideological resistance in a world structured by excess and negation.

Fields of Study & Subjects

Psychoanalysis Philosophy and Politics Psychoanalysis and Social Critique Contemporary Cultural and Social Studies

Publication details

Journal / source
Culture and Dialogue
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
45–58
Publication date
25 February 2026
Language
EN