Specific Learning Difficulties: Disparities in Identification

Read full text
Authors: Johny Daniel, Julian Elliott, Peter Tymms, Steve Strand
Cited by: 2
References: 42

Abstract

This study investigates disparities in the identification of specific learning difficulties (SpLD) in England. We estimated multilevel logistic regression models on National Pupil Database records for approximately 540,000 Year 6 students across 14,800 schools. Student-level predictors included academic performance in reading and math, gender, English as an additional language (EAL) status, mobility status, and individual economic deprivation indicator; school-level predictors included average school reading and math attainment, proportion of EAL students, and average deprivation. Substantial between-school variation in SpLD identification was observed. After controlling for attainment and student background characteristics, EAL students had markedly lower odds of identification. Similarly, female students were less likely to be identified for SpLD than their male peers. Furthermore, higher average school-level deprivation predicted reduced identification odds. These findings highlight that systemic and contextual factors, alongside individual learning profiles, shape SpLD identification and raise concerns about equitable access to assessment and support for a diverse group of learners.

Fields of Study & Subjects

School Choice and Performance Early Childhood Education and Development Psychometric Methodologies and Testing

Publication details

Journal / source
Journal of Learning Disabilities
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Volume
59
Issue
5
Pages
286–299
Publication date
25 February 2026
Language
EN